Monday, October 31, 2016

Beverly Harris discusses how the voting count will be rigged

Nor every machine, but the machine that tabulates the vote centrally:

http://www.infowars.com/how-americas-elections-are-hacked/

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Trump, Hillary, prophecies and the Bible code.

This is an unusual election. Unusual in the sense that we see a number of things that we normally do not see. Such as a Republican nominee that  fights like crazy to win, but at the same time he eschews the traditional methods used in building a coalition. It should not surprise us then that this election reverberates in the spiritual realm as well.
 
I am referring to the prophecies about the outcome. Almost everyone who claims to have prophetic gifts tell us that Donald Trump is going to be the next President, that he will be victorious. Except one lady, who claims that the Lord told her that Trump at first will not win, but will do so later. Isn't that curious?
 
A lot of the facts are becoming available that bear on this matter. First, the Donald's campaign reminds me of an episode in Judges, where the Israelites weeded out a lot of their troops in order to give God the glory for the victory. In fact, we get our word "shibboleth" (the important word that is an identifier) from this episode. Once the Israeli tribes present (and there were only 300 of them who participated in the battle) were given the victory, the always obnoxious Benjaminites tried to horn in on the glory (and maybe the spoils). So, the Southern Hebrews gave them a test. What do you see at your feet? they were asked. If the answer was "shibboleth" (creek in Hebrew)  they were allowed to pass. But, if they replied "sibboleth" (pronouncing the "sh" as "s") they were slain.
 
We know from the Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks that the Dems are going to engage in massive fraud. Part of this fraud involves recruiting illegal aliens to vote if they show a driver's license.
 
So, here is how I put this altogether. The massive fraud will put the Hilldebeast over the top, but Trump won't concede. A Bible code reads that 'Comey email coverup'
 
 
so Trump will not contest the outcome on the basis of the fraud but on the basis that the Hilldebeast had destroyed govt records ( now in the hands of the FBI), which disqualifies her from holding federal office as I previously published. As Trump becomes President, the Elites will crash the Stock Market and create a world-wide panic to make Trump into another Herbert Hoover.
 
How? Raising the interest rate substantially will crash the Stock Market (destroy accounts on margin) and jump the value of the US Dollar. This will destabilize European banks and bankrupt a bunch of countries whose debts are being counted in US Dollars. As the value of the Dollar skyrockets, banks will fail and will be bailed out by "bail ins," the use of private accounts to bail out the banks. The most likely method to do this is to restrict how much can be withdrawn. Remember that Larry Edelson's cycles predict that between 2016 and 2020 we will go through Hell on a Roller Coaster.
 
These predictions are in line with the post of Nomi Prins, a foremost financial expert:
 
 
According to Larry's cycles this period will end with the repudiation of all government debts and a new monetary system.
 

Saturday, October 29, 2016

The Remarkable Rise and Fall of the Hilldebeast.

The Elites had decided that the election was over even before the votes were counted. They pulled the "October Surprise" that they pull against any Republican running for President, marshaled their phony polls and set up a massive cheating spree that they hoped would put even Texas in the questionable column. Hillary's neurological disorders were carefully hidden and everything was proceeding according to plan. All the Clinton scandals were carefully ignored by the Drive-by-Media.

Then the WikiLeaks disclosures began. Even these were ignored by the Drive bys until we got to the story of the shakedown of the world by Bill Clinton and his foundation. It dawned on even the wussiest Republican that Bill Clinton and his wife were running a charity as a racket to launder payoffs for future considerations. Amassing a personal fortune of over $100 Million for doing charity and "consulting" could be easily understood. And the fall of the Hilldebeast had begun. The Washington Post reported that Hillary lost 8 percentage points in 4 days. Not that I believe the Post.

That was when the FBI decided to reopen the investigation into the emails of the Hilldebeast. Comey says the FBI has found more emails on Weiner's computer (sent to would-be girlfriends?). The Liberal Establishment is squealing like a stuck pig.

WikiLeaks presenter Assange tells us that there is one more batch of Clinton emails coming that will get her arrested. We will see.

WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED ABOUT HILLARY?

1. She spent two years for focus groups to learn what people prefer;
2. She is a foul mouth person who despises people, especially military and Secret Service:
3. She drinks during the day and her aides worry about sobering her up for events;
4. She is physically impaired and has Parkinson's.
5. Her aids are worried about her arrogance in disobeying handling of confidential material.

WHO LEAKED TO WICKILEAKS?

The Hilldebeast claims it is the Russians. Lots of people doubt that. One suspect is "Kim Dotcom" a New Zealander born in W Germany.
King Dotcom had a runin with the US govt and carries a grudge.

THE CLINTONS HAVE CORRUPTED POLITICS.

1. They secretly paid for opinion polls:
2. They cooperated with independent groups;
3. They had Journalists self censor their reports;
4. They organized violent protests at Trump rallies;
5. They promoted cheating by Democrats.
6. Hillary lied to Congress under oath.

From Operation Barbarossa to Operation Anaconda.

It was 1941 when Nazi Germany launched Operation Barbarossa against the Soviet Union. Hitler commanded 3 million troops. 3000 tanks, 7000 pieces of artillery and 2500 aircraft. Before that war was over, it engulfed the whole world, killing 50-80 million people, including 7 million Germans and over 20 million Russians. After the war,  Europe descended into the barbarism of Communist dictatorships and Social Democracies.

Yet, European and American elites have forgotten history. How else to explain the insanity of NATO parading 31K troops and a bunch of tanks and artillery on the border with Russia. The significance of the name OPERATION ANACONDA is not lost on the Russians. They are having nuclear drills to survive a nuclear war. Yoohoo! Anyone listening? Anyone that is sane?

The European and American Elites are on the ropes with their Keynesian economics and are trying to gin up anti-Russian sentiment. Let's hope that Trump is elected and drains the swamp.

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Finding the beginning of gold bull market.

One way of doing it is to follow the gold to silver ratio. Why does this work? Because silver is more volatile than gold, so during a gold bear market this ratio will increase as silver price decreases faster than gold price. Here is the graph that shows that:
 
So, how do you pick the top for silver? When this ratio hits 50. Then it's time to sell.

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Hillary has abnormal eye movements.

Hillary Has Abnormal Eye Movements, Say Majority of Doctors Surveyed, Reports AAPS



News provided by
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
Oct 25, 2016, 12:00 ET

 TUCSON, Ariz., Oct. 25, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Concerns about Hillary Clinton's health have been subdued after her three debate performances. She presented her ability to survive 4-and-a-half hours on a stage with Donald Trump as proof of sufficient stamina to serve as commander-in-chief.
"She evidently intended this as a joke, although I suspect our combat veterans would not be amused," states AAPS executive director Jane Orient, M.D.


Videos are, however, circulating on the internet, from her rather brief and rare appearances in public, which are purported to show pathological eye movements.
"These are quick, episodic, and inconsistent," states Dr. Orient, who is an internist. "So we decided to ask doctors on our email list to have a look at one of the videos. A helpful tool is to paste the URL into http://RowVid.com and watch it at half or quarter speed."
Nearly two-thirds of respondents said they saw abnormal movements. Only 15% did not, and 21% were unsure. There are long segments in which the eye movements appear normal.
About 60% of those who saw abnormal movements thought "the cause could be a potentially disabling neurological condition," and none of them were willing to say that it isn't.
Such movements signify an abnormality in portions of the brain that coordinate the eye muscles. There is a long differential diagnosis. Possibilities the respondents suggested include increased intracranial pressure (she is at risk for that because of her history of head trauma and a transverse sinus clot); a drug effect; or a chronic degenerative neurological condition. Parkinson's disease is mentioned—with drug treatment concealing most manifestations but causing the eye signs.
Doctors were asked which tests would be helpful, and 37 responded. The most common one was a full neurological examination by unbiased specialists, including a neuro-ophthalmologist.
"A neuro-ophthalmologist could do a structured examination, but it might be normal at a moment in time. The video clips need to be explained," stated Dr. Orient. "A cardiologist might do an electrocardiogram that is perfectly normal—but he will also look at a 24-hour monitor that may show a transient life-threatening rhythm disturbance."
"As Hillary revealed to the public, perhaps illegally, the President may have only four minutes to respond to a nuclear threat," said Dr. Orient. "The public needs to know whether she is concealing a serious, progressive illness that may impair memory, reasoning, alertness, or ability to think quickly at a critical time."
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in virtually all specialties and every state. Founded in 1943, AAPS has the motto "omnia pro aegroto," which means "all for the patient."
 
SOURCE Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Clinton vs Trump: the third debate.

Nothing new. Trump (as usual) had missed opportunities, Hillary recited talking points and lied (as usual). Her assertions that her programs of 'free' education would not add to the deficit were as credible as Obama's promises that Obamacare would save 2,000 bucks per year  per family. The only notable thing was the Media's freakout over Trump's statement that he would not automatically concede the election.


The sad fact is that the Democrat Party has destroyed democracy in this country by rampant cheating. We have seen many examples of this over the years: Cook County (Chicago) and Philadelphia are the worst examples, though some Ohio jurisdictions with their 105% turnout are not far behind. WikiLeaks and Project Veritas have produced evidence of widespread cheating. The Democrats do not deny the contents of Podesta's memos but demand we ignore them because of their source. Funny, how they did not protest the illegality of disclosing the Pentagon papers.


What is worrysome is that the Media expects the electorate to swallow this blatant hypocracy. If the Media is correct in their assumption that Americans are no longer able to think for themselves then there is no longer a basis for democratic elections.

Another "mini ice age" predicted

Earth faces another ICE AGE within 15 YEARS as Russian scientists discover Sun 'cooling'

THE Earth is heading towards another ice age as solar magnetic activity is set to drop by up to 60 per cent in the next 15 years.

                                    

An ice age could be coming
Experts say that solar activity as low as it currently is has not been seen since the mini-ice age that took place between 1645 and 1715 – a period known as the Maunder Minimum where the entire Thames froze over.
A new model has allowed experts to predict solar activity with more accuracy than ever before and it suggests that magnetic activity will fall by 60 per cent between 2030 and 2040.
The model looks at the Sun’s ’11-year heartbeat’ – the period it takes for magnetic activity to fluctuate. This cycle was first discovered some 173 years ago.
However, a mathematician has established a more up-to-date model that can forecast what the solar cycles will look like based upon dynamo effects in two layers of the Sun.
frozenGETTY
The world's temperature could drop
Dynamo effects are a geophysical theory that dictate how the movement of the Earth’s outer core conducts materials like liquid iron across the magnetic field to create an electric current – this also influences fluid motion beneath Earth’s surface to create two magnetic fields along the axis of the Earth’s rotation.
Valentina Zharkova from Northumbria University applied this theory to the Sun, and was able to predict the affects of solar cycles with 97 per cent accuracy.
Ms Zharkova said at the National Astronomy Meeting: “We found magnetic wave components appearing in pairs, originating in two different layers in the Sun's interior. 
londonGETTY
Scence like this could be common in London
“They both have a frequency of approximately 11 years, although this frequency is slightly different, and they are offset in time.
“Combining both waves together and comparing to real data for the current solar cycle, we found that our predictions showed an accuracy of 97 per cent.”
Ms Zharkova says the next cycle is set to peak in 2022, and the cycle after, known as Cycle 26, will herald a new ice age.
freezeGETTY
Worldwide temperatures will drop
She continued: "In Cycle 26, the two waves exactly mirror each other - peaking at the same time but in opposite hemispheres of the Sun.
“Their interaction will be disruptive, or they will nearly cancel each other. We predict that this will lead to the properties of a 'Maunder minimum’." 
Although it seems insignificant, it led to shorter seasons and ultimately food shortages.
The Maunder Minimum is also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum" and is the name used for the period starting in about 1645 and continuing to about 1715
During this 70 year period sunspots became exceedingly rare.
The phenomenon was only properly researched in 1976 when  John Eddy published a scientific paper.
Astronomers before Eddy had also named the period after the husband and wife solar astronomers Annie Maunder E. Walter Maunder  who studied how sunspot latitudes changed with time.
Climate models have shown that low solar activity interferes with the Jet Stream – the current of air and warm water which keeps Britain’s temperatures higher than they would otherwise be

Friday, October 21, 2016

Recession is very near.

I have already posted the shipping index that shows how economies are contracting. There are three other indicators of a coming recession: 1. Consumer Confidence (hits max before an economic downturn); 2. truck sales (go down) and restaurant performance. The latter has fallen precipitously:
 
 
 
Restaurants are doing poorly because people's discretionary incomes have fallen.
 
Chances are that the FED will ease, but if Trup gets elected, they may crash the Market by increasing rates so the Media can blame Trump.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Hillary: How stupid is this woman?

She is lucky that she is facing Trump (not the best debater) or she would have been taken apart.

1. She wants to continue what Obama has done but do more? That is the definition of insanity.

2. She wants to impose a 'no flying zone' in Syria. Does she not know that such a declaration is near an act of war and can be enforced only through battle?

That is bad enough, but she wants to negotiate it with the Russians.  Really? And she calls Trump dangerous?

Hillary Superpak is paying for poll results.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/busted-anonymous-hillary-drops-massive-bomb-just-nv-debate/

Corruption in theFBI.

According to the FBI notes, State Department Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy contacted an FBI official whose name was censored. Kennedy was a close aide to Clinton during her tenure as the nation’s top diplomat between 2009 and early 2013. 
 
An FBI official in the International Operations division said that in May or June of last year Kennedy asked him for “assistance in changing a classification of FBI information contained in an email,” according to the FBI records. Changing the classification, Kennedy told the FBI official “would allow him to archive the document in the basement of the [State Department] never to be seen again,” the interview document said, and the official -- who did not yet know what was in the email -- told Kennedy “he would look into the email matter if Kennedy would provide authority concerning the FBI’s request to increase its personnel in Iraq.”
 
But after their conversation, the FBI official said that he found out that the email was related to the 2012 Benghzai consulate attacks. Then, he said he contacted Kennedy and “informed him that there was no way he could assist Kennedy with declassifying the information contained in the email,” according to the FBI records.
 
But an FBI official who works in the Records Management division had another version of the story. He told FBI investigators that the State Department had sent five emails from Clinton’s private email account to the FBI to vet the emails before they were publicly released. The State Department official had said that all of the emails had been transmitted to him on a classified system, yet they were marked unclassified. The FBI determined that one of those emails “appeared classified,” a finding that was reported back to the State Department, and then contested by the Office of Legal Counsel. The FBI maintained that the email had been classified appropriately.
 
Then, the first FBI official -- the one from the International Operations division -- called to pressure the second FBI official to change the status to unclassified, “indicat[ing] that he had been contacted by Patrick Kennedy ... who had asked his assistance in altering the email’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo.’ [The FBI International Operations division official] advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, State would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more agents in countries where they are presently forbidden,” the FBI record said.
 
The FBI official from Records Management then attended a State Department meeting about the Clinton emails, where someone asked if any of the emails in question were classified. Undersecretary Kennedy responded, “Well, we’ll see” -- while making eye contact with the FBI official, who interpreted this as a reference to the single email that the FBI had deemed classified. In a private meeting with Kennedy afterward, the undersecretary of state asked whether the FBI could “see their way to marking the email unclassified?” 
 
If the email remained classified, it would mean that Clinton or her staff had emailed classified information -- Clinton asserted throughout the FBI’s investigation that she did not have any classified emails on her private server. It is not completely clear from what was released by the FBI Monday whether the quid pro quo suggestion originated with the FBI or with Kennedy. In the end, the FBI did not change the classification of the email.

Hillary: meltdown over Matt Lauer's question.


WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AT THE NBC PRESIDENTIAL FORUM WITH MATT LAUER

    DEMOCRAT HILLARY CLINTON’S BEHIND THE SCENES TIRADE AFTER NBC’s MATT LAUER ASKED CLINTON  THE ONE QUESTION SHE HAD NOT PRE-APPROVED


       VETERAN NBC CAMERAMAN:   ‘YO U REALLY HAD TO SEE THIS TO BELIEVE IT...SHE CAME APART – LITERALLY UNGLUED; SHE IS THE MOST FOUL-MOUTHED WOMAN I’VE EVER HEARD...AND THAT  VOICE AT SCREECH LEVEL...AWFUL’

     ”SHE LOOKED SO ENRAGED THAT WE ALL THOUGHT HER HEAD WOULD EXPLODE...IT WAS A FULL-ON MELT-DOWN AND THEN SHE SCREAMED SHE’D GET THAT F - - - ING LAUER FIRED FOR THIS. IT WENT ON FOR AT LEAST A HALF HOUR; WE ALL THOUGHT THE EMS  WOULD BE THE NEXT CALL”

       NBC Associate Producer of Forum

       Behind the scenes, NBC technicians and cameramen at the Wednesday night, Commander-in-Chief Forum (Sept 7) report that Hillary Clinton was so angry and incensed that she had been  ‘blind-sided’ by one question she was not prepared for and had not approved in advance.

       “When her time in front of the cameras ended, Clinton shook the hand Lauer extended to her and smiled once more for the wide camera shot and then Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and threw it at the face of her assistant and the screaming started. She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her – she went kind of manic and didn't have any control over herself at that point. How   these people work with this woman is amazing to me.  Most of the small military audience were cordoned off, their seating not close to Mrs. Clinton, but certainly they heard her screaming because it was loud...and she really didn't seem to care who heard any of  it.”

        Republican Donald Trump also appeared, in a separate telecast from Hillary Clinton’s and arrived with his two sons but no entourage or assistants in tow. The NBC cameramen involved in his segment said he was a ‘true gentleman’ and Trump and his sons spoke to everyone and thanked them for inviting him to speak: “It was a pleasure to answer your questions Matt.”

       Hillary Clinton’s segment was much different. According to people working on the sidelines, “When Matt posed the one legitimate question about the FBI investigation concerning her homemade server and the unsecured emails, we could see she was beginning to boil and her eyes looked to pop.”

       “It was toward the end of her interview so she was becoming unglued by the time Lauer finished with questioning.  Hillary went ballistic, throwing a huge tantrum and scream ing at her staff, “you f - - - ing idiots, you were supposed to have this thing set up for me and you’ve screwed it up!  If that f - - - ing bastard wins we all hang from nooses! Lauer’s finished...and if I lose it’s all on you ass - - - - s for screwing this up.”

       Clinton finally stormed off the military ‘set’ and the assistant producer said she was screaming that she wanted to talk to “the idiot who set this mess up...you do not blindside me - ever!” and continued to demand to speak with executives at Comcast, parent company to NBC Universal.

       Her dozen or more aides were visibly disturbed and tried to calm her down when she started shaking uncontrollably.  That did not stop her from demanding an executive “on the phone, now!”  She was told the executive-in-charge of the forum was ready to talk with her and she was l ed away by two rather large aides who appeared to help her walk.

       The TV executives got the message with all of the censuring headlines that followed over the next couple of days when it seemed the entire media turned on Matt Lauer for behaving in a “partisan” manner and “being grossly unfair and critical of the former secretary of state.”

      Matt Lauer was heavily criticized on air by the Clinton campaign the rest of the week with most of the mainstream media joining in. The media appeared to frame Matt’s one serious question as the Clinton campaign was doing...”an unfair and partisan attack on Mrs. Clinton.”

       Matt Lauer is still facing major backlash following his 23 minutes with Hillary Clinton. Privately, many reporters said Matt handed the Democrat nominee the expected softball questions, but made the decision to ask about the emails because, “the American people deserve an answer from the former secretary of state.”

      Calls were made to New York Times, Washington Post and Huffington Post and Twitter executives with orders to “Crush Matt Lauer”. As you can easily see with all the headlines from these MSM sources, they did as they were told by the Clinton campaign.

     Hillary also screamed that she would be “treated with respect at the debates or heads will roll.”  Staffers at the Clinton campaign report that they fear her wrath and uncontrollable outbursts, and one described Hillary as  “an egotistical psychopath”.

     Since Hillary does not allow any staff to have cell phones when she is in their presence, no footage is available, but Hillary will never let this rest.  She has made it clear that she wants Matt Lauer to be “persona non grata - for putting her on the spot.”

      Interim DNC chairman Donna Brazile, the first black woman to hold the position, was singled out by Hillary during the rant.   She screamed at Donna, “I’m so sick of your face.   You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f - - - ing Lauer get away with this.   What are you good for, really?   Get the f - - - to work  janitoring this mess - do I make myself clear?”

       A female NBC executive said that Donna Brazile looked at Mrs. Clinton and never flinched, which seemed to enrage Hillary all the more.  The executive continued, “It was the most awful and terrible...and racist display – such a profane meltdown I have ever witnessed from anyone,  and I will never forget it.  That woman should never see the inside of the oval office I can tell you that.&n bsp; She was unhinged and just continued to verbally abuse everyone – she was out of control.”

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

A vote for Hillary is a vote for treason!

A Vote For Treason

from Zerohedge
Tyler Durden's picture
It has taken several months and a number of email dumps from Wikileaks to finally figure out what this presidential election is all about. There are only two ways to vote, for Donald Trump or for Hillary Clinton. But neither of those are what one would be voting for.
A vote for Donald Trump is a vote to resist the massive corruption of government, a vote against globalism, against "global warming" or "climate change" theology; it is a vote against media collusion and interference in politics. A vote for Donald Trump is not a vote for the person at all, that is why despite the media onslaught of negative stories about him as a person carries no weight with those who support him, because they don't support him at all, they support what he represents, which is a chance to hold Hillary Clinton responsible for her crimes and therefore all of the crooked politicians of 2012 who coerced votes out of their Republican base only to turn on them the next day.
Likewise, a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for a transformed America, a quasi-police state where the government intervenes in business and forces some out of business while subsidizing other businesses that could not possibly sustain themselves without massive graft and media brainwashing. All of those businesses would be held hostage to a criminal organization originating from the White House. It would be a vote to end forever the concept of individual rights. Hillary Clinton would do no less than continue the work of the Obama Administration to destroy individual rights and nearly half of the nation is in favor of just that. It would be a continued replacement of the voters who value the principles of the founding of this nation with those who have no like expectation. It is a vote for the sudden disappearance of websites like this one.
The outcome is bigger than that. The next president will likely be a true war-time president. As Vladimir Zhirinovsky claimed a vote for Hillary Clinton would be a vote for war. War with Russia may be inevitable and irrespective of the election as it seems likely that war will begin before the next president can take office. But, there is the question of who would be more likely to effectively fight that war. More than that, would our military leaders be willing to follow the orders of a criminal like Hillary Clinton running a crime organization out of Washington? Would they put their lives in jeopardy knowing the cold-blooded actions she demonstrated in Benghazi? Or, would they likely recognize that their lives meant nothing to the Commander in Chief?
So many things are now known about the media establishment and the collusion it shares with the Clinton campaign. More things are being found out every day as Wikileaks provides proof of the public perception. The people were right, there is a conspiracy to keep them uninformed and misinformed to protect Democrat politicians from facing scandals. It is clear now that there will never be a Democrat held accountable for their actions and therefore the only time Americans can expect to get anything other than abusive and criminal officeholders is if they elect a Republican.
This is where we get back to a vote for Donald Trump is nothing other than a vote for accountable leadership. A vote for Hillary Clinton is giving up on that ideal. A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote to abolish the very principles of elected officials, because if their misdeeds can never be told and their abuses never aired, what have we? That we have so many in this nation willing to vote for Hillary tells us all we need to know about the other side, that they have already given up, that they would rather have a totalitarian system. A vote for Hillary is, in effect an act of treason.

Society is near a breaking point.

from Zerohedge
Sprott Money's picture

The Big Retail Sales Lie

Most, if not all, data coming from private-sector sources conflicts and undermines the “seasonally adjusted” garbage data reported by the Government.

The Elite "Have No Idea" - Society Is Near The Breaking Point

Tyler Durden's picture
Authored by 'Chindit13',
What I find most surprising today is that the insiders and the elite have no idea what is percolating just beneath the surface.  Okay, maybe their arrogance actually produces its own fog, so it should not come as a surprise that they are blinded. They do not look at the calendar, which, if one really looks, says "1788" on it.  Something is close.  Very close.  Society is near the breaking point.
My own experience is that Hillary’s so-called Deplorables are actually the most reserved, most polite, and most honest demographic in the country. They are more informed, more self-reliant, and among other things, better armed.  Regarding their arms, they are incredibly responsible, and not the source of the violence for which the implement, and not the person, is too often blamed.  The Deplorables have the longest fuse.  It is, however, a fuse.
Alt Left, on the other hand, are the Neo Fascists and Neo Neocons.  It is Alt Left that thinks Free Speech means THEIR speech only.  It is Alt Left that needs 'safe spaces' and wants to enforce thought crime.
It is Alt Left, and its media lapdog sites, that is heavily into censorship of ideas that diverge from their approved ideology.  It is Alt Left that champions regime change and ratcheting up the rhetoric against Russia. It is Alt Left that believes it has an inherent right, even an obligation, to lie and obfuscate if it serves their greater purpose.
Perhaps most significant is that it is Alt Left who so quickly resorts to violence and vandalism when confronted with people and ideas with which it takes exception.  Never has that been as clear as in this election cycle.
The Deplorables, however, are not possessed of infinite patience. Like a capacitor, there is a charge building, and at some point it will be released into the circuitry of society.
The media and other insiders believe themselves to be immune.  That thought no doubt results from being immersed inside a cocoon where dissonant voices are not allowed.  When the levee breaks, or the capacitor releases its charge, they are going to be gob smacked.
Precious few of them are anywhere near as immune as they believe themselves to be.  Additionally, what they might think, or hope, is their support, their security, their safe space, doesn't really exist.
Most of society's guardians, whether they are law enforcement or military, are card-carrying members of the Deplorables.
France was similarly constructed in the late 1780s.  The elite were isolated only in thought, not in reality.  Their protection was of a Potemkin Village nature: not actually there, but merely a facade that gave them false comfort.
They paid dearly for their arrogance and ignorance.
History may not repeat, but it does rhyme.  The calendar really does seem to say 1788, so 1789---and 1792--are not as far off as some would like to believe.
This is not a call to arms, but it is a call to reality.  Ignore it at your own peril.
Some may see these words as a threat.  They are not.  They are, however, a warning, and a warning from someone who is a student of history.
Every society eventually reaches a breaking point.  Ours is nearly there.  Some of those who might feel threatened, the so-called elite and insiders, think that they can buy protection as easily as they can buy a Gulfstream.  How naïve!  Who are the private security contractors?  Who are the various SOGs?  Like law enforcement and the rest of the military, they are the Deplorables.  The Deplorables will take your money, but you will not take their lives.  Better said, they won’t give up their lives for you or your family.  The security you believe you have purchased is an illusion.  Make that delusion.  Best to get that out front here and now.
Some who feel threatened, or nervous, might fall back on the tired adage of ‘We gave them (the Deplorables) everything; what do they think they will do without us?’  Well, the use of ‘we’ is arrogant, because those who have actually produced something of value are few and far between.  Industrialists, for lack of a better term, are those who produced for society things of lasting value.  There are few true industrialists today, and many who still remain have shipped their production overseas, jacking up the compensation of bonus-based execs, but contributing to the hollowing out of America.  The true industrialists did produce the cars, trucks, machine tools, generators, servers and even computers.  They produced lifesaving medicines and treatments.  They made steel plants and built railroads.
They produced jobs.  They even produced the guns that the Deplorables have by the hundreds of millions. The Deplorables recognize that entire contribution.
Mark Zuckerberg, however, is not Henry Ford.  Jack Dorsey is not Andrew Carnegie.  Mark Benioff is not John Rockefeller.  Lloyd Blankfein is not John Pierpont Morgan.  (Elon Musk might turn out to be someone of significance, if he is allowed to fail and is forgiven for it.  Time will tell.)  The old Robber Barons, despite their faults, did produce things of lasting value.
What did these new ‘titans of industry’ give us?  Facebook?  Snapchat?
Twitter?  They gave us banality and pabulum.  Some embraced it, despite its triteness, perhaps because all other meaning had already been lost, like America’s exported jobs.  These new titans, Neo Titans, did little more than help dumb down society.  They made America less productive, less curious, more pedestrian.  Maybe they think they gave us the internet, but credit for that goes to DARPA, which is to say the military, which is to say the Deplorables.  The Neo Titans gave America nothing, at least nothing positive.  Social networking?  Gaming?  Selfies?
The Deplorables can live without the silly oxymoron called social networking, which, as anyone who looks at it objectively knows, is anything but social.  We don’t care what two thousand of our fake friends had for breakfast, or what Andrew Ross Sorkin thinks of the latest Presidential debate.  He probably thinks we do.  After all, he has ‘Twitter Followers’, whom he assumes live and die by his every Tweet.  We can live without that.  I wonder if his ego can?  He, and those of his ilk, are merely Kim Kardashians without knowing it.  They are the talentless dishing out white bread to the emotionally and spiritually starved.
Some might think this is all Trump’s fault.  Again, that shows a degree of ignorance and naïveté which characterizes the elite.  Trump is a symptom, not a cause.  He might even be a salve, as the changes he could bring might defuse some of the current anger.
On the other hand, Hillary is a lit match in a room of dynamite.  She, like many of the self-important, thinks her very existence is a favor to the rest of us.  She epitomizes the absolute worst of what America has become.  Above the law, wealthy not through accomplishment, but through influence peddling only, and a bull in a china shop in terms of her effect on both the country and the world---and I apologize to bulls for that analogy.  The world is more unstable because of her.
America is less safe because of her.  Russia and the US---the two largest nuclear powers---are more at odds because of her.  With her in power, we will reach the breaking point at home and internationally, perhaps leading to ‘accidental’ nuclear war, as the heightened rhetoric impacts clear thinking.  Society is more stratified because of her.  Race relations have deteriorated because of her (and Obama).
There are few current ills in society and in geopolitics that cannot be laid at her feet, at least to some extent.  The Great Deceiver to many, who exhibits an astonishing aversion to truth telling, is enough to make even an agnostic wonder if the anti-Christ hasn’t finally arrived for its three and a half years of rule.
A recently hacked email of John Podesta finds him saying “she (Hillary) has begun to hate everyday Americans”.  No doubt the same feelings were voiced by Nicolas Ceaucescu.  It turned out the feeling was mutual.
Elect Hillary, and continue with business as usual, and it is likely this warning will become an epitaph for the America we know.  Society may collapse regardless, because the rot is already very great, but she will hasten the day of reckoning.
The Deplorables have already considered what is coming.  They are as prepared as they can be.  Years of decline have enabled many to build their survival skills, to make due with less, to build real communities where one man can trust another, to discover what is truly important and what can and should be salvaged from this society.
Outside of that demographic, however, people are stark naked.  They are vulnerable in ways they simply cannot imagine.  They are unprepared and unskilled for what will matter most.  They are cannon fodder living on borrowed time.
History is full of examples of this sort of collapse.  We humans have always rolled along a sine wave of progress and decline, of civility and social unrest.  We think we have outgrown the sort of mayhem with which the history books are full, but that thought stems from recency bias.  Most of history---the vast majority---is not peaceful.
Societies are not, on average, stable and safe.  Thomas Hobbes knew that quite well, as evidenced in his most famous quote.  Humanity is likely on the verge of returning to the mean, and the mean is exactly that:  mean.  In case some have forgotten their Hobbes:  solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.
Have a nice day.

Monday, October 17, 2016

Casey - doom and gloom.

Doug Casey is a premier financial analyst. He is talking about the coming currency failure in the United States. IMO, the more the FED does to pump up the Stock Market, the greater the effects will be when the Day of Reckoning arrives.
 
Here is what Casey says:
 
"Just how bad could it get?
Casey explains:
What could happen? You could have lots of bank failures. You could have a stock market crash. All this money that the government has created has bulled up the stock market to new highs. So, the next step is likely to be down. A lot of people have assets in the stock market, and if they don’t, their pension funds are in the stock market. Most of the cities in this country have and most of the states in this country have gigantic pension liabilities that are underfunded, underfunded even though the stock market is at all-time highs and the bond market is in a super bubble.” 
He continues…
Now, when interest rates inevitably go up from these artificially suppressed levels where they are now, the bond market is going to collapse, the stock market is going to collapse, and with it, the real estate market is going to collapse. These pension funds are going to be wiped out.  Then what’s going to happen? This is a very bad situation. The U.S. is digging itself in deeper and deeper.”
The bottom line, according to Casey, is anyone living in the U.S. or who has assets priced in dollars is at serious risk right now.
 
Since, the warning about calamities unfolding have not been followed up by the forecast calamities, people think that they will not happen.
 
Casey has a new video out and warns that the FOREX Market is giving out bad vibes. Here is a graphic comparing the size of the various markets:
 
How will we know that things began to unravel? Casey produced a graph of FOREX trades. And we see that inflation is now above the 2% the FED claims to have as a desired goal.
 
Here is the latest on inflation. It is beginning:
 
 

Sunday, October 16, 2016

America's failed policies.

Donald Trump claims that our leaders have followed stupid policies. Let's fact-check this statement.

US policies contributed to the strangling of the gold price.  The outgrowth of this has been a strangling of commodities, oil prices and our economic activity. Our industrialists have transferred whole factories and the knowledge of automation to other countries so that American industries can not compete with automated factories run by low-wage workers.

All this has played into the hands of the Chinese. Low priced commodities allow the Chinese to build the Silk Road and become the dominant power in the region of fifty countries. That is not the end of the disasters awaiting us if Hillary is allowed to continue the Obama policies. Here is a summary of how China will destroy the US Dollar:

http://kingworldnews.com/chinas-plans-to-dominate-the-world-and-the-real-reason-why-china-is-buying-so-much-gold/

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Hillary is disqualified to hold any Federal Office.


Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton's private email server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding any federal office.

Such as, say, President of the United States. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071. 

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what it says:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office , or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

 

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
 
Should she be elected we are not obliged to accept her election.

 

Nuts and bolts of collusion between Media and Clinton campaign.

Rigged Debates: Wikileaks Emails Confirm Media in Clinton’s Pocket

Clinton's people asked for all sorts of special treatment from the DNC and the press—and they got it


U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L) embraces Center for American Progress President and CEO John Podesta before addressing the centers' "American Idea: A More Perfect Union" conference at the Decatur House October 12, 2011 in Washington, DC.
Hillary Clinton embraces campaign chair John Podesta on October 12, 2011 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevila/Getty Images)
On October 12, WikiLeaks released part four and five of Clinton campaign Chair John Podesta’s emails, with part six to be released on October 13, and part seven to follow on October 14.
“As soon as the nomination is wrapped up, I will be your biggest surrogate,” current Interim Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Donna Brazile, wrote to Podesta in a January 2016 email. As a Vice Chair of the DNC, Brazile was bound to neutrality per the charter, but as shown in several emails released so far, that was not the case.
“I pushed back hard on this, and Axe. So weird to attack the kids the night before the first primary,” Brazile wrote in an email she forwarded to Podesta about what CNN was doing while she served as a CNN contributor.
On October 10, an email was released that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to an outreach campaign being conducted by the Sanders campaign. Brazile defended herself on Twitter claiming she also sent the Sanders campaign “advice,” but did not release or cite any examples.
On October 11, Mediaite’s Jordan Chariton first reported another email that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to a question on the death penalty that would be asked at a CNN Town Hall the next day. Brazile was a CNN contributor at the time, and that wasn’t her only helpful tip. “For the debate team,” she wrote in a March email about the Voting Rights Act, forwarded to Podesta.
In 2013, during an interview with ABC News, Brazile said, “if Clinton gets in the race, there will be a coronation of her,” foreshadowing that she and the rest of the DNC and Democratic Party would line up behind Hillary Clinton as the nominee before a single person voted in the Democratic primaries.
In a March 2016 email, Mark Alan Siegel, a former New York State Assemblyman and Democratic official, advised the Clinton campaign staff to offer Bernie Sanders and his supporters a reduction in future super delegates to pacify them. “So if we ‘give’ Bernie this in the Convention’s rules committee, his people will think they’ve ‘won’ something from the Party Establishment,” he wrote. “And it functionally doesn’t make any difference anyway. They win. We don’t lose. Everyone is happy.”
Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress which publishes Think Progress, wrote in a January 2016 email, “But I should say that I would do whatever Hillary needs always. I owe her a lot. And I’m a loyal soldier.”
An April 2015 email describes the Clinton campaign and DNC coordinating to rig the debate schedule for Clinton’s benefit. The debate schedule was a commonly cited criticism against then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who resigned after the WikiLeaks release of DNC emails in July showed her overt favoritism for Clinton all through the primaries.
“Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina)” read the email from Charlie Baker, a senior advisor to the Clinton campaign from the Dewey Square Group. “The other campaigns have advocated (not surprisingly) for more debates and for the schedule to start significantly earlier.”
An email from November 2014 shows Clinton campaign staff backing a law that would push the Illinois primary from March to April or May, with their reasoning being that the state could potentially serve as a lifeline to moderate Republicans as it did for Mitt Romney in 2012. “The Clintons won’t forget what their friends have done for them. It would be helpful to feel out what path, if any, we have to get them to yes. This will probably take some pushing,” wrote Clinton Campaign Manager Robby Mook to Podesta. The primary wound up not being moved, with Trump winning Illinois, but the push was strategic as Clinton didn’t poll well against moderate Republicans such as Sen. Marco Rubio and Gov. John Kasich.
In damage control over a false statement Clinton made about Nancy Reagan’s role in the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the Clinton campaign noted in an email chain that they would have to coerce Clinton into admitting she was wrong. “Here is a revised draft of a statement. It does include the words ‘I made a mistake’ in the first line. We need a strategy for getting her to approve this.”
And then there’s the overly docile press, who were so eager to help Clinton get elected. In one email chain discussing the upcoming release of exchanges between Clinton and writer Sidney Blumenthal, insiders noted that the Associated Press appeared to be willing to allow the Clinton campaign to plant favorable stories. “[T]hey are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it,” wrote Nick Merrill, the Clinton campaign’s traveling press secretary.
“She is going to read me the story later today off the record to further assure me,” Clinton campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri wrote in an email to Podesta and other staff about New York Times‘ Maggie Haberman coordinating directly with the campaign to provide Clinton with favorable coverage.
In March 2015, an email from Clinton campaign manager assistant Marissa Astor provides some options for when a story in the AP will be published, with a statement from Clinton and Q&A regarding her private email server, in addition to an option to “pre-negotiate” a TV interview.
An April 2015 email from Clinton staff issued a press policy that says, “Less than 100 people – NO cell phones, NO press.” According to the email, events with over 100 people, cell phones are allowed, “and ONE print pooler will be escorted in for her remarks only and then escorted out. NO tv cameras. Over 500 people in a public space – YES cell phones, OPEN press (all press access including tv cameras). At fundraisers in private homes NO tv cameras no matter the size. ONE print pooler only.” According to the email, Hillary Clinton approved the policy. “Huma spoke to HRC and she agreed with this plan,” wrote Kristina Schake, the Clinton campaign deputy communications director.
In a January 2015 email, in response to an inquiry as to whether the Clinton staff have any diversity they can point to, political consultant Jim Margolis jokes, “Robby claims he’s 1/16th Apache, so we should be all set.”
Part four, five, six, and seven brings the total WikiLeaks release of Podesta emails to around 10,000 out of about 50,000.