Monday, March 12, 2018

gun control solution: prohibit Democrats from owning guns.


 

 

this appears to be an excellent solution on issue of gun control
 

 
A Possible Solution to Domestic Gun Violence
In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln,
President of the United States .
In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield,
President of the United States - who later died from the wound.

In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed
John F. Kennedy, President of the United States .
In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at
Gerald Ford, President of the United States .

In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded
Ronald Reagan, President of the United States .
In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot
and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX .
In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the
White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush,
President of the U.S.

In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho,
shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared
Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and
killed 6 others.
In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes,
went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat,
shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza,
shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.

In Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 At a Navy ship yard.
 
On June 2017, an angry Democrat shot  Republican Steve Scalise
On October 1, 2017 the Los Vegas gunman killed 59 concert goers.
 
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican
conservative was involved in any of these shootings.




SOLUTION:
It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
We don't need gun control, we need Democrat control.
Guns don't kill people, Democrats do!
 
 

 

 

Virus-free. www.avast.com

 

 




 

 

 

Friday, March 9, 2018

The scientific quest for immortality.


A California biotech company has deciphered not only the genetic code that stops and then reverses aging... It has also patented a technology enabling it to flip a genetic switch within our DNA, the "God Switch".

This may ignite a fireball of controversy — possibly worldwide protests that could make the violence in the Islamic world over portrayals of Muhammad seem genteel by comparison.

Because, it too, has tremendous religious implications:

Some will say it’s blasphemous and sacrilegious — that it discredits the importance and power of God.

No doubt major health care corporations and pharmaceutical giants, here and abroad, will start a bidding war — competing for the right to license this revolutionary technology, if not purchase these biotech companies outright.

The Biotech world is on the verge of a miracle of scientific discovery — proof that scientists could accomplish what was previously thought impossible… what many in the world will believe is a violation of God’s will.

A chance to live forever and remain forever young: practical, real immortality.

Let me first quote a headline that appeared in the Los Angeles Times in 1998 when early test results were first revealed:

"Scientists Give Cell Apparent Immortality."

Another newspaper wrote:

“Firm Finds Fountain of Youth for Human Cells”

And the Oakland Tribune wrote:

“Researchers Immortalize Human Cells.”

That was then, of course, when the science was still, for lack of a better word, immature, and not ready to be commercialized.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent and President Obama’s nominee for surgeon general in 2009 said, “I think in the next couple of decades, we’re going to get to a point of practical immortality.”

Little did he realize then how the decades could be compressed into a few short years?

Today, the laboratory doors have swung open again!

And now we can see how far the science has evolved.

A biotech company, BioTime, has deciphered not only the genetic code that stops, and then reverses aging… It has also patented a technology enabling it to flip a genetic switch within our DNA, what many now call the “God Switch”…Which may make human cells immortal.

They do not — will not die.

Indeed, it appears that every time the God Switch is flipped, it returns the aged, tired, worn-out cells of your body to the biologically pristine state they were on day one — the day you were born. One company has already been granted hundreds of patents related to the God Switch. Nevertheless, FDA approval is a near certainty, as no drugs are involved. As you will see, to flip the God Switch, no foreign or unnatural substance is used or introduced into the body.

Indeed, the remarkable thing about stem cell therapeutics is that it doesn’t require the invention of new drugs with unknown side effects. This new technology can lead us to products and therapies that could free us from many diseases and afflictions that plague or kill us. These include heart disease, cancer, and arthritis, to name just a few.

Today, in the United States, it’s estimated that 73% of the population — more than 200 million people — will die of heart failure, cancer or stroke. In fact, 2,000 Americans die of heart disease every day. But what if, starting tomorrow, the number could be brought down closer to zero.

One company owns the technology that could make it possible.

The scientists working at this company, and one scientist in particular, think they have, in essence, discovered how to regenerate the human body — to make it heal and renew itself — quickly, painlessly and naturally. They have harnessed the power that exists within all of us to cure disease, prevent disease and, ultimately, eliminate aging.

It’s the biggest discovery in the history of modern medicine, if not medicine itself.

The scientists working for and collaborating with BioTime are some of the most respected names in the field of regenerative medicine. In fact, the owner of BioTime, Dr. Michael West who is also its lead scientist, is often referred to as the father of regenerative medicine.

His area of focus: stem cell therapeutics.

Unlike all the other cells in your body: skin cells, heart cells, brain cells… stem cells are, for the most part, blanks. In scientific terms, they are unpotentiated. In other words, their fate has not yet been determined.

They are waiting to be programmed by your DNA to become heart cells, skin cells, bone cells and all the other thousands of cell types that exist in your body.

And that ability to be programmed… can now be directed and manipulated in this company’s laboratory. This is a miraculous breakthrough. Once, it was only theoretically possible. Today, it’s not only possible — it’s actually being done.

Imagine… stem cells that can be programmed to replace aged, damaged or diseased hearts, brains and lungs, and even limbs, joints and skin.

Yet ironically, the greatest strides in stem cell research made by BioTime and other biotech companies came only after “human embryonic” stem cell research was banned.

At the time, it was believed only embryonic stem cells could cure the tens of millions of people suffering from devastating and deadly diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

Embryonic stem cell therapy is actually a false messiah — and a dead end.

It has two flaws, two existential barriers that cannot be overcome.

The first barrier is supply and demand.

If embryonic stem cell therapies were actually developed and proven successful, where would all those 100 million human embryos come from?

The second barrier is our immune system.

Because embryonic stem cells are, in effect, foreign bodies, our immune system will, in most cases, reject them.

The cure, then, would be worse than the disease.

A raft of new companies arose, seeking to use non-embryonic “adult” stem cells for their research. The sort found in bone marrow and skin. It made sense.

If you cut your skin, stem cells immediately kick in and fix the damage. Similarly, if you donate a pint of blood, you have stem cells in your marrow that crank up the production of new blood cells. This is actual proof of the regenerative capability of our bodies.

Only a limited number of adult stem cell types exist. Your heart, eyes, brain, knee cartilage and kidneys, for example, don’t possess stem cells.

The passing of our DNA from one generation to the next is proof that a part of us can continue on forever.

What if there was a mechanism within our DNA, a genetic code that could reverse-engineer any adult cell in our body into an embryonic-like stem cell?

In a few short years, after countless twists and turns, scientists have actually found that very mechanism!

Four genes within our DNA were found that can be manipulated to turn any adult cells — skin cells, for example — into embryonic-like stem cells.

In 2007, Japanese researcher Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, and a researcher from the University of Wisconsin, James Thomson, published papers showing that these four genes could actually transform adult human cells into an embryonic-like state.

They were awarded the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries.

Because the cells used did not come from discarded embryos, the reprogrammed cells were not called “embryonic stem cells” but were, instead, named “induced pluripotent stem cells,” or iPS cells for short.

iPS cells immediately lit a fire under the scientific community.
Like embryonic stem cells, they have the potential to make all the cells of the human body.

But, unlike embryonic stem cells, they won’t be rejected. Because, they’re the patient’s own cells.

Moreover, because they’re the patient’s own cells — neither embryo nor egg cells — iPS cells are also noncontroversial.

Nevertheless, there was a problem with this approach as well, and it was a big one…

To turn adult cells into iPS cells, the four genes had to be inserted into the adult cells. But, they couldn’t merely be dropped in. They had to be carried in.

And the carrier vehicle Dr. Yamanaka used to introduce these genes into the adult cells was a virus.

Though the type of virus used was dormant, it was obvious the FDA would never allow an unstable and unpredictable biological agent, a virus associated with cancer, no less, to be used in human therapies.

It was determined, too, that the process by which the virus and the four genes were inserted is destructive to the cell on a submicroscopic level.

And over time, it usually resulted in the cell’s death.

It was another dead end.

Ironically, Dr. Yamanaka was just awarded the 2012 Nobel Prize in medicine for his work — work that, in fact, doesn’t work.

And what does that prove?

Stem cell research has now earned the respect it richly deserves. It’s no longer controversial or morally reprehensible. Therefore, interest in stem cell research will be renewed.
Regenerative medicine, and stem cell companies, in particular, will again become the darlings of Wall Street.

Because Dr. Yamanaka’s process of inserting the four genes into an adult cell to create iPS cells appeared to be another dead end…

If there was one way to create an iPS cell, there had to be another.

And soon enough, it was Dr. West’s team at BioTime who found it — and far quicker than anyone could’ve imagined.

The research team realized that if other animals (certain mammals, fish and reptiles, for example) could self-regenerate — grow new limbs or tails and repair damaged internal organs — it wasn’t impossible.

And we should, therefore, given the right conditions, be able to do the same.

Enter the one gene that rules them all — the God Switch!

Making this as non-technical as possible:

Our DNA is, in a very real sense, a software program. It is also locked and encrypted. Otherwise, the genes that make up our DNA could be manipulated and even corrupted by unintended outside forces or influences — viruses, for example. Yet, we know the encryption code protecting our DNA can be turned off.

And, we know this because when cells multiply — when we grow taller or build muscle, for example — our cells are dividing and making exact replicas of themselves. This means the DNA is also dividing and replicating itself so it can be passed into the new cell, as this diagram illustrates:



But, for the DNA to replicate and pass into a new cell, encryption must be turned off.

Finding the encryption key — in other words, the gene or genes responsible for encryption — could unlock the cell and instruct it to return to its embryonic state — just as Yamanaka did using a virus.

Easier said than done, of course.

The human genome contains approximately 20,000 genes; not all of which are understood, much less their millions of possible combinations. Basically, this is finding “a needle in a haystack” — a haystack the size of Mount Everest.

After analyzing gene “expressions” from numerous cancerous and healthy cells, this scientific team noticed that one particular gene, named SP100, was not activated in cancer cells.

There is now found evidence in various studies that the author / researchers had clearly failed to understand — that SP100 is indeed the encryption key for the human cell.

In other words, when the SP100 gene is deactivated, the human cell is unencrypted.

DNA is then available for genetic modification, good or ill.

Meaning if SP100 is deactivated, cells could mutate and become cancerous.

But it also means…

Cancerous cells might be cured when SP100 is reactivated!

And, of course, by deactivating SP100, Dr. West and his team at BioTime could now take any adult cell in your body and return it to its embryonic-like state — make it a pure and healthy stem cell, an iPS cell.

A quick side note: BioTime is now on the threshold of using gene SP100 to screen patients for cancer before they actually develop cancer, and even cure cancer if they already have it.

What still had to be accomplished was successfully directing an iPS cell to become any one of the 200-plus types of cells within the human body.

And, now that too has been done.

In other words, biologically, their age was the same as that of the patient.

And, that’s a problem — a big problem.

Because if we were to take skin cells from a 65-year-old patient who had suffered a heart attack — in which heart muscle had been damaged or destroyed — and turned those skin cells into iPS heart cells...

Those iPS heart cells would be 65 years old.

In essence, researchers needed to reverse cellular aging — to make an iPS cell as young as a newborn baby.

Many in the scientific community felt that this final hurdle was trying to accomplish the impossible.

What is impossible today can be possible tomorrow.

Based on previous scientific studies, there must also be a gene that controls aging — and if scientists could crack its genetic code, they could stop, and even reverse, aging. And, the proof that this was, indeed, possible was cancer.

Cancer cells do not age. They are, in medical terms, immortal. They continue to replicate without end; they do not die. The only way they will die is if they’re killed or the host body dies.

Following the breadcrumbs left behind by previous research, it took Dr. West and BioTime a few years to find this “immortalizing gene” and crack its code.

But, find it and crack it they did.

The research team successfully immortalized an iPS cell — it became ageless and continued to replicate without end.

After published these findings, CNBC immediately asked to interview Dr. West so he could explain why his company’s stock had more than doubled overnight.

The rest of the world’s press was also quick to pick up on this impossible breakthrough…

A Bloomberg headline read: “Stock Soars as Firm Clones ‘Immortality’ Gene.”

Time Magazine titled its coverage “The Immortality Enzyme.”

The San Jose Mercury News wrote a story titled “Endless Youth?”

The biggest challenge still lies ahead

That challenge is to take an immortal iPS cell and direct it to become any one of the hundreds of cell types in the human body so that when those cells are ready to be injected back into the donor’s body, they would be no older than the day the donor was born.

Only after being programmed to become adult cells of a specific type would their biological clock start ticking.

In theory, by injecting age-zero Endothelial Precursor Cells (EPCs) into your body, derived from your own iPS cells, they would have the power to completely rejuvenate your entire cardiovascular system — thereby extending the warranty on your cardiovascular system— EACH TIME IT’S DONE!

It could also be the equivalent of a complete vascular transplant without surgery — and without the possibility of rejection.

This, my friend, could be the key to true IMMORTALITY.
Note: from Cryonics Asia, Ltd.

You can do what you want with any investment suggestions derived from other web site page links attached to this web site. Cryonics Asia, Ltd. does not give investment recommendations nor do we profit from any involvement with any commercial biotech company. It is not our intension to start peddling money making opportunities. But, according to our due diligence, this company is real and what they are doing has great implications for all Crayonists. Things that make Cryonic resuscitation feasible could be changing very fast. Whole body or just a neuropreservation choice may now take on a whole new dimension.

I don’t know of anyone getting a customized stem cell DNA targeted injection, of late, but this new stem cell research sure sounds exciting.

To date, Dr. West and his team at BioTime have developed proprietary processes to develop over 200 different cell types from iPS cells. Endothelial Precursor Cells (EPCs) discussed above are just one of these cell types.

It should be noted that, as far as we know, Dr. West’s company was the first publicly traded stem cell company to partner with Big Pharma.

BioTime’s neuroscience subsidiary will supply stem cells to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries for the purpose of developing treatments for retinal and neural degenerative diseases. Israel-based Teva, as you might know, is one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world, with annual revenues in excess of $16 billion. Together, BioTime and Teva will develop and commercialize BioTime’s treatment for age-related macular degeneration, which is a growing concern for aging baby boomers.

he God Switch Company

BioTime (BTX)

The key part of the scientific advancement — largely related to telomerase, the aging enzyme first cloned 20 years ago. The company that headlined those advances was Geron (GERN), which was the standard-bearer for stem cell research among publicly traded companies for a long time.

BioTime (BTX) helmed by Dr. Michael West, and was a founder of Geron and has been described as a pioneer of stem cell research.

This company’s strategy of pursuing multiple products and technologies using a set of seven subsidiaries, or that’s what BioTime had until they added an eighth subsidiary (BioTime Acquisition Corp) to buy some of the stem cell intellectual property from Geron.

Dr. Michael West has described a few of BioTime’s key products, which include a new cancer diagnostic test that could become a huge seller pending final FDA approval.

BioTime is a small company but not a ridiculously teensy one, with a market cap of close to $200 million, and the shares were recently up by a good 15-20% on their pending deal with Geron.

The 52 week range: $2.67 - $5.07

Current trading price $3.68

Related Tickers 4/5/2013 -- 4:00 PM



Some of the companies in this Stem Cell therapeutics space include: BTX, GERN, BCLI.OB, ACTC.OB, CUR, ISCC, MKGAY.PK, PSTI, STEM, TEVA, UTHR

Two Scientists have been recognized for a Stem Cell discovery and awarded the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. In 2007, Japanese researcher Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, and a researcher from the University of Wisconsin, James Thomson, published papers showing that four genes could actually transform adult human cells into an embryonic-like state. The prize was awarded for the scientists’ "discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become pluripotent."

Four genes, within our DNA, were found that can be manipulated to turn any adult cells — skin cells, for example — into embryonic-like stem cells capable of developing into any cell in the human body.

Continuing this line of discovery, BioTime now has eight subsidiaries that are involved in a lot of different things, and each one is apparently a joint venture that helps to get outside funding. That, and BioTime’s work to expand cell lines that are available for researchers at low cost (but with royalties due on future products) gives quite a few ways for the science to “work” in a business sense (ie, to make money).

In terms of substantial new products from BioTime, it looks like they’re targeting late 2014/early 2015 as a key time period, that’s when they hope to get European approval for a their new cancer blood screening test, which would be a big deal (identifying genetic markers of cancer in the blood might be more effective and catch cancer much earlier than conventional screening like mammography or colonoscopy), and for a plastic surgery product called Renevia … and before that they hope to have launched clinical trials for an Age-related Macular Degeneration drug called OpReven that’s partnered with Teva (TEVA).

So, there are some potential catalysts out there, though from a look at the BioTime balance sheet it appears they’ll probably have to bring in some cash from a new partnership or raise money over the next couple quarters in some other way.

Reading their latest investor presentation, it sounds like they’re on the verge of some products that are large, real and addressable. Whether they have now “cracked the code” to repair and rejuvenate human cells that is yet to be fully reveled.

BioTime could make enough money licensing their cell lines and selling research materials to turn them into a steady cash generator who could push that cash into developing these really breakthrough rejuvenating cell product lines.

Would the real prospect of stem cell triggered immortality be a “Godsend”, financially or otherwise?

Maybe immortality would lead to the Earth being such a festering, overpopulated cesspool that none of us would want to live forever, I expect… but I can see that developments along the way to that hypothetical future, like all of the advancements in regenerative medicine to help your body repair itself from specific injuries or diseases, would certainly be welcomed by the marketplace … not least because the largest and wealthiest generation (the baby boomers) of the wealthiest country on earth is starting to face its own mortality.

In a recent article, on page 54 of the Feb 2013 issue of Life Extension magazine, Dr. West describes how he obtained $2,000,000 from the Life Extension Foundation to found ReCyte for the purpose of pursuing the use of pluripotent stem cells for the rejuvenation of heart and circulatory system tissue. ReCyte is a subsidiary of BioTime. It is significant that the LE Foundation was willing to invest big time for this endeavor.

BioTime facts

Headquarters (founded)Alameda, Calif. (1990)
Market Cap$234 million
Industry Biotechnology
Trailing-12-Month Revenue $4.3 million
ManagementCEO Dr. Michael West (since 2007)
CFO Peter Garcia (since 2011)
Return on Equity (average, past 3 years)(44.5%)
Cash/Debt$7.8 million / $0
CompetitorsB. Braun Melsungen
Baxter International
Hospira
The above recent Life Extension magazine article featured another company International Stem Cell Corporation (ISCC): http://www.internationalstemcell.com/Stem_Cells. They are supposedly working on an alternative, more universally accepted stem cell that could be used in 80-90% of the population. International Stem Cell Corporation has developed a powerful new stem cell technology, callepart henogenesis that promises to significantly advance the field of regenerative medicine by addressing the problem of immune-rejection.

Another interesting Company in the stem cell research space is Advanced Cell Technology (ACTC) a leader in the field of regenerative medicine. ACTC today announced treatment of patients in the third patient cohort, in each of its two U.S. clinical trials for forms of macular degeneration. Patients in U.S. Clinical Trials were injected with 150,000 human embryonic stem cell-(hESC) derived Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells.

While stem cell research is certainly exciting, and the macular degeneration cure is real, selling “eternal life” may surly be viewed by serious institutional portfolio managers as ridiculous at best. But, what else is new?

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Doug Casey: guns, teachers and society.


Doug Casey on Arming Teachers

Justin’s note: On February 14, 17 people lost their lives in a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
Sadly, tragedies like this routinely happen in the United States. Every time they do, Americans demand radical reforms. And for once, the government’s delivering.
President Trump has already said that he wants to ban the sale of bump stocks. And he thinks teachers and coaches should carry firearms in schools.
That’s a controversial suggestion. Some people think Trump’s a lunatic for saying this. Other people think it’s a brilliant idea.
But I couldn’t help but wonder what Doug Casey thinks. So, I called and asked him myself…

Justin: Doug, what do you think of Trump’s latest suggestion?
Doug: It’s an OK temporary solution. First of all, everybody has a right to be armed. Historically, a major difference between a slave and a free man was that a free man could be armed. The slave couldn’t. The right to be armed is primarily a moral issue, not a legal issue. It’s a matter of principle. Which means it’s not open to compromise.
But there’s also a practical aspect to this. If you can’t arm yourself, you’re at the mercy of anyone who is. I believe the people who want to confiscate—i.e., steal—or restrict weapons are actually both dangerous and stupid. Why stupid? Let’s define the word. Being stupid doesn’t necessarily mean having a low IQ. Anti-gun nuts sometimes have high IQs—but IQ is surprisingly irrelevant in daily life.
A better definition of stupidity is “an inability to see only the immediate and direct consequences of actions, not the indirect and delayed consequences.” Among those, being unarmed is putting oneself at the mercy of a stronger miscreant. An even better definition of stupidity is “an unwitting tendency towards self-destruction.” If an anti-gun nut suffers a home invasion, perhaps then he’ll realize how stupid it is.
Anyway, it’s not just a question of guns. If bad guys aren’t using guns, they’ll use explosives, or vehicles, or poisons, or edged weapons just as effectively. The guy who committed this latest shooting could probably have done just as much damage with a machete.
That’s because it’s harder to disarm somebody with an edged weapon than it is a gun. Yeah, it’s true that you don’t want to bring a knife to a gun fight. But edged weapons are just as devastating as guns in close quarters, which is where these things usually happen.
  

--
Justin: So you don’t blame guns?
Doug: No, I don’t. It’s ridiculous to demonize guns. Any weapon can kill lots of people.
The Rwandans proved that you can kill almost a million people in a matter of months just using machetes. Think about that…
The problem is that society has become so degraded that the average man feels he doesn’t even have a right to defend himself. They’re like sheep, expecting some shepherd to keep them safe. It’s magical thinking. They think that the government—which is by far the most dangerous and destructive force in society—will protect them from anything and everything. Furthermore, the elite think they know what’s best for everybody.
So, teachers should, of course, be able to carry guns in school. And they shouldn’t need permission to do so. But this leads us to an even more basic question: Why are almost all schools run by the State? If schooling was 100% private, each one could find its own solution to this, and any other possible threats. The whole system should be flushed…
Justin: But Doug, what about AR-15s and other military-grade weapons? Should the average person have that much firepower at their disposal?
Doug: Of course they should. Guns are just metal tools.
You’ve got to remember that before the Roosevelt administration, anybody could buy a fully automatic weapon. They could even purchase a belt-fed machine gun if they wanted to. No problem. Of course, you still can. It was quite easy up until about 10 years ago for anyone to become a gun dealer, including a Class 3 license for automatic and suppressed weapons. It’s harder today—but still not hard to do.
But automatic weapons, or bump stocks on semi-autos, are a strawman. Soldiers only rarely use their assault rifles on full auto, for a number of reasons.
The real question is: Why are we having all these problems now? The average American used to be familiar with guns. Many more Americans owned them in the past and used them regularly. But, oddly, the current problems didn’t exist.
When I was in high school in the ‘60s, everybody owned a gun. We’d often just grab our 22s or shotguns, and go out walking in the fields and woods, shooting.
One time, I flew from Chicago to D.C. on United Airlines, and I had two guns with me. One was a rifle. The other was a pistol. I was a 17-year-old kid. I threw them in the overhead compartment. It was obvious that I was armed. Same thing on the way back. There was no hysteria. Nobody cared.
   
--
Justin: You still own many firearms, right?
Doug: I used to, but sold most of them, just keeping some favorites. But I don’t hunt with them. I gave that up. I didn’t enjoy it. I don’t like killing things. In fact, I don’t even like deep-sea fishing anymore. Nothing wrong with it. But blood sports aren’t for me.
Justin: Are your guns for protection then, or do you own them mainly as collector’s items?
Doug: Guns are fun to play with. They’re like stamps and coins, both of which I also used to collect.
Guns are for both amusement and self-defense. It’s idiotic to try to say the Second Amendment is just about hunting. That’s got absolutely nothing to do with it. It’s about defending yourself. As I said, if someone invades your home in the middle of the night, you don’t want to engage in hand-to-hand combat. Even if the intruder or intruders were unarmed, it’s insane to think you could deal with them without a gun.
Justin: Got it. If guns aren’t to blame for these tragedies, what’s the problem?
Doug: Several things. I think the two big ones are psychiatric medications and the lack of a father in the families of the shooters.
I don’t know if you saw this list that was published recently, but almost all of the attackers in these recent shootings were either on or had recently come off of SSRIs. Antidepressants, things like Paxil, Zoloft, Prozac, and so forth. And it seems half the boys in grade school today are put on Ritalin. All these drugs are very dangerous, especially for brains and minds that are still being formed. These things can make people unstable and crazy. And yet, people are blaming guns.
They’re not even considering whether there’s a medical cause for these atrocities. Even worse, you have to dig to find that most of these kids were on psych meds. Maybe all of them, for all we know. Shootings were never a problem until the ‘80s when huge numbers of kids were put on these things.
The other cause may be cultural. When boys grow up without a father or a strong male influence, it may leave a moral vacuum. This is part of the PC trend towards thinking men are unnecessary and dangerous. It seems almost all of the shooters grew up with their mothers only. And this is equally true for black kids. Although in their case, it seems to evidence itself in street shootings and gang violence.
Justin: If it’s a mental health issue, then what should be done?
Doug: Well, certainly not put more kids on antidepressants. And you won’t solve the problem by illegalizing guns. It’s hard to solve the cultural element of this. Political correctness, hatred of Western Civilization, neo-Marxism, and the rest of it seem to have won the day. For just that reason, my guess is you’re also going to see more, not less, people on psychiatric drugs.
But it’s not just that people think pills can provide an answer to their psychological problems. Most people only take these pharmaceuticals because their insurance pays for them. Government programs and insurance pay for them, removing any possible disincentive to take them.
If people had to pay for their Prozac and its 100 look-alikes out of their pocket, not as many people would use them. I suspect the number of crazy shootings, in schools and anywhere else, would plummet.
We’ve discussed the economic, political, and cultural decline of the US before. School shootings are just part of a syndrome, shades of Rome in the Third Century. A huge number of distortions have been cranked into the way society works by the government. “Solving” the most topical ones with new laws is like taking aspirin for cancer.
Justin: If shootings are merely a symptom of a degrading society, what, if anything, could repair it?
Doug: Well, I’m not sure this can be reversed until we have a genuine crisis. And unfortunately, things usually get worse during a crisis. And a real crisis is coming to the US.
We’re almost there. It’s almost reaching the stage of France before 1789. I would’ve been enthusiastic about getting rid of Louis XVI, but then it got worse after the revolution. They got Robespierre, and then Napoleon. And the same thing in Russia. I would’ve supported the overthrow of Nicholas II. But with the revolution, things got worse. Then came Lenin, and it got even worse with Stalin.
I’m afraid when the crisis hits, Americans will go for a domestic version of Robespierre or Lenin to solve it.
School shootings aren’t a gun problem—that’s ridiculous. It’s a cultural problem. It’s one of many symptoms of the degradation of civilization itself. And I’m not sure there’s a solution for that. If you started to roll back all the huge distortions that government has cranked into society, that in itself might be a match to the tinderbox.
Massive social upsets have a life of their own. I sometimes really wonder if the US isn’t on the ragged edge of a civil war.
Justin: You’ve mentioned that before. I remember our discussion about the US breaking apart along racial lines?
Doug: Yes. The Social Justice Warriors, identity politics types, and leftists in general—they’re also the anti-gun fanatics—are making race a real issue instead of just an accidental characteristic of being a human. Worse, you can’t even talk about it unless you’re part of some supposedly suppressed minority and blame your alleged problems on “the patriarchy” and Western Civilization.
Making new laws against inanimate objects like guns is like welding shut the lid on a pressure cooker. It’s a serious mistake. Banning guns isn’t the solution. In fact, I suggest that when the world is going crazy, every self-respecting person should be well-armed.
Justin: Great stuff as always, Doug. Thanks for taking the time to speak with me today.
Doug: My pleasure.

 
 

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

We need a third Specil Council.

1. The first one is investigating what? What crime is Robert Mueller investigating? He is on a fishing expedition. There was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Even if there were, it would not be a crime.

2. Congressional Republicans called for a Special Council to investigate the a) the circumventing of the FISA laws, b) the illegal surveying of the Trump campaign and c) the illegal payments made to Hillary Clinton and the Media's efforts to cover this up.

3. The third Special Counsel is needed to investigate who Barak Hussein Obama is.


It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Library" about his early years now that he is out of office.


 

In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't it seem odd that there's so little we know about Barack Obama?


 

For example, we know that Andrew Jackson's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.


 

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our news makers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own ex-president.


 

We are all aware of the lack of incontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful.


 

There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.


 

One other interesting thing...   There are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found?


 

It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up.  The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself.  We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess, Joe Biden's aneurysms are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we all know about their heart  problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known.  That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soooo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."


 

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow. Who was best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check groomsmen.


 

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors?  It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.


 

When did he meet Michele, and how? Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library, etc.  What has he released? And who voted for him to be the most popular man in 2010?  Doesn't this make you wonder?


 

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc??  Not one person has ever come forward from his past.


 

It certainly is very, very strange...


 

This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"


 

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about  us.


 

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign.  


 

He questions why no one has acknowledged he was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus.  Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984.  He says he never had a single class with him.      


 

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?    Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University.


 

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him.    


 

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever."


 

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him.    At class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class?   Me.  No one ever heard of Barack!  


 

And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."


 

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbooks and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.


 

Some other interesting questions:


 

1.Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?   It is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.


 

2...Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order? We understand that it was forced to avoid fraud charges.


 

It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 alias' are connected to him.


 

The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is reported to have never lived. And was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there.


 

As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not reused.  No wonder all his records are sealed...
 
 
Barak Hussein Obama was enrolled in a school in Indonesia which is restricted to citizens of Indonesia. There is no record of him being naturalized. The laws specify that the US President must be a natural born US citizen. Not being one would have been a crime.