skip to main | skip to sidebar

Geezer In Exile

This blog will deal with large things and little things: spiritual truths, politics and economy, news, comment, food and the State of Texas. Oh, and my poetry and pictures. Enjoy.

Saturday, March 30, 2019

Gold breakout postponed?

We have come to see that charting gold became nearly useless in predicting the moves in the gold market. The formation that is known as a "cup and handle" led some to conclude that maybe the long term charting was devoid of interference by the usual suspects. According to that pattern, we should be heading up to $1400/oz. What happened Thursday was a carpet bombing of all precious metals including gold, silver, palladium and rhodium. So, the cup and handle pattern turned into a wedge that can break up or down. The gold breakout is postponed. How long can the FED keep this up?
Posted by Geezer Bela at 5:11 AM 0 comments

Sunday, March 24, 2019

Venezuelan Left did not set out to ruin their country.

AOC backtracks that she and the 'Justice Democrats' do not want to institute Socialism as practiced in Venezuela. Well, Hugo Chavez and his merry band of Socialists were not trying to  destroy Venezuela's economy; they thought they were instituting justice and improvements. As Venezuela's economy sank, it is then that the Chavez regime (now led by Maduro) resorted to running a military dictatorship.

I have detailed the reasons why Socialism fails. It brings great hardships and ruin for a country foolhardy to try it. Democrats know this and that is why they try to disarms us ahead of time, so we can not save ourselves once it is imposed.

The question is do we have the right to prevent the transition to Socialism even if people vote for it?

The Democrats perfected the art of cheating: voting of the phantom voters casting votes by vote harvestors, 'finding' bundles of "uncounted" votes, letting illegals vote and manufacturing absentee ballots. But, even if elections were absolutely legit, do we have the right to prevent a Socialist takeover? The Colonists rebelled against an unjust king that trampled on their freedoms. Do we have the right to  prevent the uninformed, the schemers and the AOCs, who are just plain wrong, to prevent the ruining of our country? That is the question we must answer before 2020.





Posted by Geezer Bela at 5:44 AM 0 comments

Friday, March 22, 2019

FED may trap us into recession.

AJ begins: US recessions are almost always caused by the FED guessing wrong on interest rates/money supplies. Why is the FED eventually makes the mistake? Because it does not know that it has made a mistake untill the interest rate curve inverts. By then it is too late and a recession is on the way. Here is how this game works:

"Inverted Yield Curve and Why It Predicts a Recession







Glossary
  • REAL ESTATE
  • STOCK MARKET
  • FISCAL POLICY
  • MONETARY POLICY
  • TRADE POLICY
GLOSSARY  REAL ESTATE

Inverted Yield Curve and Why It Predicts a Recession

Why the Yield Curve Is Inverted Now

  • Share
  • Pin
  • Email



photo illustration of bar graph with dollar signs overshadowing the financial section of a newspaper
•••

BY KIMBERLY AMADEO

Updated February 12, 2019
An inverted yield curve is when the yields on bonds with a shorter duration are higher than the yields on bonds that have a longer duration. It's an abnormal situation that often signals an impending recession.
In a normal yield curve, the short-term bills yield less than the long-term bonds. Investors expect a lower return when their money is tied up for a shorter period. They require a higher yield to give them more return on a long-term investment.
When a yield curve inverts, it's because investors have little confidence in the near-term economy. They demand more yield for a short-term investment than for a long-term one. They perceive the near-term as riskier than the distant future. They would prefer to buy long-term bonds and tie up their money for years even though they receive lower yields. They would only do this if they think the economy is getting worse in the near-term. 

What an Inverted Yield Curve Means

An inverted yield curve is most worrying when it occurs with Treasury yields. That's when yields on short-term Treasury bills, notes, and bonds are higher than long-term yields. The U.S. Treasury Department sells them in 12 maturities. They are:
  • One-month, two-month, three-month, and six-month bills.
  • One-year, two-year,  three-year, five-year, and 10-year Treasury notes.
  • 30-year bonds.
During healthy economic growth, the yield on a 30-year bond will be three points higher than the yield on a three-month bill.
An inverted yield curve means investors believe they will make more by holding onto a longer-term Treasury than a short-term one. They know that with a short-term bill, they have to reinvest that money in a few months. If they believe a recession is coming, they expect the value of the short-term bills to plummet soon. They know that the Federal Reserve lowers the fed funds rate when the economy slows. Short-term Treasury bill yields track the fed funds rate.

Why the Yield Curve Inverts

So why does the yield curve invert? As investors flock to long-term Treasury bonds, the yields on those bonds fall. They are in demand, so they don't need as high a yield to attract investors. The demand for short-term Treasury bills falls. They need to pay a higher yield to attract investors. Eventually, the yield on short-term Treasurys rises higher than the yield on long-term bonds and the yield curve inverts.
Recessions last 18 months on average. If investors believe a recession is imminent, they'll want a safe investment for two years. They'll avoid any Treasurys less than two years. That sends demand for those bills down, sending their yields up, and inverting the curve.

Why It Inverted in December 2018

On December 3, 2018, the Treasury yield curve inverted for the first time since the recession. The yield on the five-year note was 2.83. That's slightly lower than the yield of 2.84 on the three-year note. In this case, you want to look at the spread between the 3-year and 5-year notes. It was -0.01 points.



Date3-Mo2-Yr3-Yr5-Yr10-Yr3-5 yr. Spread
Dec. 3, 20182.382.832.842.832.98-0.01

Investors are saying that the economy will be a bit better in five years than in three years. The Federal Open Market Committee will finish raising the fed funds rate in two years. It's planning to raise it to 3.4 percent in 2020. Investors are worried it could trigger an economic slowdown in three years if the Fed overshoots and raises rates too high. They believe the economy will have recovered in five years.

When the Inverted Yield Curve Last Forecast a Recession

The Treasury yield curve inverted before the recessions of 2001, 1991, and 1981. 
The yield curve also predicted the 2008 financial crisis two years earlier. The first inversion occurred on December 22, 2005. The Fed, worried about an asset bubble in the housing market, had been raising the fed funds rate since June 2004. By December, it was 4.25 percent.
That pushed the yield on the two-year Treasury bill to 4.41 percent. But the yield on the 10-year Treasury note didn't rise as fast, hitting only 4.39 percent. That meant investors were willing to accept a lower return for lending their money for 10 years than for two years.
The difference between the 2-year note and the 10-year note is called the Treasury yield spread. It was -0.02 points. That was the first inversion.
A month later, on January 31, 2000, the Fed had raised the fed funds rate. The two-year bill yield rose to 4.54 percent. But that was more than the 10-year yield of 4.53 percent. Yet the Fed kept raising rates, hitting 5.25 percent in June 2006. The fed funds rate history can tell you how the Federal Reserve has managed inflation and recession throughout the years.
On July 17, 2006, the inversion worsened again when the 10-year note yielded 5.07 percent, less than the two-year note of 5.12 percent. This showed that investors thought the Fed was headed in the wrong direction. It was warning of the impending “subprime mortgage crisis.



DateFed Funds3-Mo2-Yr7-Yr10-Yr2 to 10 yr. Spread
Dec. 30, 20054.254.094.414.364.39-0.02
Jan. 31, 20064.504.474.544.494.53-0.01
Jul. 17, 20065.255.115.125.045.07-0.05

Unfortunately, the Fed ignored the warning. It thought that as long as long-term yields were low, they would provide enough liquidity in the economy to prevent a recession. The Fed was wrong.
The yield curve stayed inverted until June 2007. Throughout the summer, it flip-flopped back and forth, between an inverted and flat yield curve. By September 2007, the Fed finally became concerned. It lowered the fed funds rate to 4.75 percent. It was a half point, which was a significant drop. The Fed meant to send an aggressive signal to the markets. 
The Fed continued to lower the rate 10 times until it reached zero by the end of 2008. The yield curve was no longer inverted, but it was too late. The economy had entered the worst recession since the Great Depression. The current fed funds ratedetermines the outlook of the U.S. economy. Word to the wise: Never ignore an inverted yield curve.
Posted by Geezer Bela at 4:15 PM 0 comments

Sunday, March 17, 2019

The case for Capitalism.


It was reported that Millenials split 50/50 on whether their generation wants Socialism or not. Let us provide them the facts because they aren’t getting them in school or in the Media. Socialism has been tried in many places. It has failed. The only countries that remain socialist are Cuba, Zimbabwe, N Korea and Venezuela. They are all showcases of miserable Hell holes. Of these four, Cuba is trying to extricate itself, but it may not happen until the Castro brothers are gone and Venezuela is in a state of revolt.
Socialists offer two excuses: 1. That the “right people” aren’t running it and that is why Socialism fails. Isn’t it odd that Socialism always falls into the wrong hands? Be the leaders black Africans, Orientals, Latin Americans or white Europeans, the result is always the same: failure. 2. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells us that she does not want Socialism as practiced in Venezuela, but Socialism as practiced in Sweden. I am sure that the leaders of Venezuela thought that they were doing the right thing, but alas, they have taken Latin America’s best economy and made it into a basket case in 10 short years. How about Sweden? The Swedes tell us that yes, they did try Socialism, it did not work and they got rid of it.  Unfortunately, this is a well kept secret as far as the educationalists and the Media are concerned. AOC, for example, believes that Sweden is still Socialist.
The reasons why Socialism fails are simple: in a Capitalist economy, you must make a profit to survive and you can not waste money and stay in business for long. In a Socialist economy, the State protects the losers even if they produce loss after loss. Not only that, but the State can dictate and force practices that lose money. The losses mount until people produce very little profit and wages fall. After all, wages are paid out of the money that enterprises earn. If the State tries to pay people by printing money, the currency fails. There is another economic reason why Socialism fails. If private ownership is allowed, but Socialism is practiced via high taxes to level income, owners will do things that are less taxable. High taxes on profit discourage people from producing profit. After all, who wants to get into the 70% tax bracket?
There is another reason why Socialism must be avoided. The Chinese Communist Party decided to give up on Socialism and adopt a form of Capitalism. And China’s economy flourished.  
By now a lot of young people have been convinced that income inequality is wrong, that profits are immoral and that getting income from investing is evil. But, these very practices have been endorsed by God Himself. Jesus had a number of missions: He taught, He healed, He prophesized and yes, He became the ultimate blood sacrifice through which Man can be saved. And toward the end of His ministry, He sanctified (endorsed) inequality, profit, interest on deposits and profit from investment. This is recounted in the Gospel of Matthew (Chapter 25, under the heading of ‘The Parable of the Talents’). A rich man was to travel to a far country and before he was to leave he called in his servants and gave them his money to manage in his absence; one received 5 Talents, another received 2 and the third one, one Talent (inequality). When he returned, he called his servants to account. Servants one and two engaged in commerce and doubled their money. The rich man was very pleased with these servants, praised them and rewarded them (endorsement of profit).
The third servant, however, simply buried the Talent for safekeeping. He was severely reprimanded and his Talent was taken away. It is significant that the one Talent was not divided equally between the two servants who earned money, but was given to the one who earned the five Talents (unequal distribution of capital based on results). In rebuking the unprofitable servant the rich man lamented that at the very least the servant should have deposited the one Talent with the bankers so it would earn interest (endorsement of interest on deposit). The rich man identifies himself as one who ‘reaps where he has not sown and gathers where he has not scattered seed.’ Thus is endorsed the concept of having earnings on investing money and having others do the work (endorsing the concept of an investor who earns money on capital he invests. THIS IS THE ENDORSEMENT OF CAPITALISM ITSELF).
Some folk insist that Jesus was simply talking about the use of talents in service of the Gospel, but Matthew’s Gospel was not written in English (in which language ‘talent’ can be understood also as an ability to do something. Talent, in fact was a high value Greek coin.). Just to be certain that He would not be misunderstood, Jesus told the same parable using the Greek coin “mina.’ (Luke, chapter 19, under the heading ‘The Parable of the Minas’).  
Thus, God tells us that He is the source of wealth and gives us instructions on how to use capital. Does this mean that we are to seek wealth for its own sake, above everything else? No, not at all. Jesus answered a question that the two greatest commandments were: 1. Love God above all else and 2. To love our neighbors as ourselves. And He gave plenty of examples on how to help our neighbor materially.
Why do some intellectuals advocate Socialism? Because they do not believe in God and so construct a Baal (a man-made god) called the State to run the economy. And such an economy fails. Reliably! Every time! God warns us that anything that He is not in (i. e. does not approve of ) fails. And it does. So, the next time you hear a billionaire advocating higher taxes and Socialism asks him why he does not use his money to help people less successful than himself? There is no law stopping him. Chances are that he is just a poser who wants OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY spent by the State to earn praise for himself from people who do not know better.


Posted by Geezer Bela at 5:41 AM 0 comments

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Gold: Is this it now?

How many times have the experts tell us that gold was about to start a bull run? I lost count. They are telling us again. We expect that the average Investor is scared out of his or her wits to jump in so maybe this time......

Gold is doing a cup and handle formation:


The gold miners' index has already completed the cup and handle:


NOTE. The fifty day moving average has crossed the 200 day moving average for both gold and the gold miners' index. Both are indicated to be in a bull market. The depth of the cup for gold indicates an interim top around 1520.  Does this mean that the BIS and the FED are not going to squelch a rise in gold prices? No! The experts say that now they can not. The smart money has already bought a lot of gold stock.
Posted by Geezer Bela at 1:38 PM 0 comments

Thursday, March 7, 2019

Lawyer joke.

A guy was looking for a place to sit in a crowded university library.
He asked a girl: "Do you mind if I sit beside you?"
The girl replied, in a loud voice. "NO, I DON'T WANT TO SPEND THE NIGHT WITH YOU!"
All the people in the library started staring at the guy, who was deeply embarrassed and moved to another table.
After a couple of minutes, the girl walked quietly to the guy's table and said with a laugh: "I study psychology, and I know what a man is thinking; I bet you felt embarrassed, right?"
The guy responded in a loud voice: "$500 FOR ONE NIGHT? ..... I`M NOT PAYING YOU THAT MUCH!"
All the people in the library looked at the girl in shock.
The guy whispered to her:  "I study law, and I’m learning how to screw people."
Posted by Geezer Bela at 2:04 PM 0 comments

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Docked in Chicago harbot.




Posted by Geezer Bela at 8:23 AM 0 comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Followers

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2019 (90)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ▼  March (7)
      • Gold breakout postponed?
      • Venezuelan Left did not set out to ruin their coun...
      • FED may trap us into recession.
      • The case for Capitalism.
      • Gold: Is this it now?
      • Lawyer joke.
      • Docked in Chicago harbot.
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2018 (288)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (25)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (29)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2017 (406)
    • ►  December (38)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (30)
    • ►  September (25)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (34)
    • ►  April (29)
    • ►  March (35)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (41)
  • ►  2016 (330)
    • ►  December (29)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (31)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (37)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2015 (261)
    • ►  December (27)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2014 (183)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2013 (154)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2012 (197)
    • ►  December (19)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (88)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (64)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2009 (191)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (28)
    • ►  September (44)
    • ►  August (52)
    • ►  July (31)

About Me

My photo
View my complete profile