Our transparent administration is not being
transparent—again.
by William Hamilton, J.D., Ph.D.
Last week, the U.S. Navy dispatched two of its
fearsomely armed Riverine Command Boats (RCBs) to patrol between Kuwait and
Bahrain. Somehow, the RCBs were seized by the Iranian Navy; the crewmembers
arrested, and -- even though the U.S. and Iran are not technically at war --
treated as Prisoners of War (POWs). How could this happen?
The Swedish-designed, U.S.- manufactured RCBs
cost $2.8 million per copy. Each RCB carries six machine guns, to include a .50
caliber Gatling gun, plus grenade launchers. Covered with armor plating able to
deflect AK-47 fire, the RCB's 49.4 mile-per-hour top speed means RCBs can
outrun every known surface warship.
To guard against surprise attack, RCBs carry
the Sea FLIR III infrared sensor system, thermal imaging, a laser rangefinder,
and long-range radar. Navigation is by a top-of-the line GPS and chart plotter
system, along with traditional chart and compass back-up. The RCB's world-wide
communications gear nets with ships, aircraft, and ground forces.
Operating in pairs, the RCBs provide each other
with mutual fire support. If one RCB is disabled, the other RCB can tow it to
safety. Thus, the question arises: How could two RCBs lose their ability to
navigate at the same time and stray into Iranian waters? And how could two world-class
weapons platforms be seized by the, arguably, inferior Iranian Navy?
Apparently, one of the RCB's had a propulsion
problem and radioed U.S. 5th Fleet in Bahrain for assistance. Congressman Louis
Gohmert (R) of Texas claims the Obama White House intervened, asked the Iranian
Navy to provide assistance, and ordered the U.S. 5th Fleet to stand down.
By long-standing naval custom, disabled boats
found in territorial waters are rendered assistance, and simply escorted back
into international waters. Their crews are not subjected to POW treatment or
put on world-wide video display, looking like criminals.
But, instead of being treated as distressed
vessels exercising the mariners' right of innocent passage, the Iranians
arrested the crew members, treated them as POWs, and, somehow, got the
officer-in-charge to make filmed statements praising the Iranians and saying
the treatment the crew received was: "Fantastic."
Absent Congressman Gohmert's explanation --
citing White House intervention -- it appears Articles II and V of the U.S.
military's Code of Conduct were violated.
Article II states: "I will never surrender
of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my
command while they still have the means to resist." Article V reads:
"When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give
name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further
questions to the best of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements
disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause."
Alternatively, could it be that the White
House-imposed Rules of Engagement (ROE) robbed the RCBs of their "means to
resist"?
Were the RCB's awesome weapons even permitted
to be loaded? Congress should demand to see the Operations Order under which
the two RCBs left Kuwait for Bahrain and demand copies of all the
communications between the RCBs, U.S. 5th Fleet, and the White House.
Meanwhile, the RCB crews are left twisting in the wind.
============
Nationally syndicated columnist, William
Hamilton, is a laureate of the Oklahoma Journalism Hall of Fame, the Colorado
Aviation Hall of Fame, the Oklahoma University Army ROTC Wall of Fame, and is a
recipient of the University of Nebraska 2015 Alumni Achievement Award. He was
educated at the University of Oklahoma, the George Washington University, the
Infantry School, the U.S Naval War College, the University of Nebraska, and
Harvard University.
No comments:
Post a Comment