Why were Dems so hot to change requirement forPresidency?

AJ begins. Why is it that Barak Hussein Obama's college records are kept under seal? One possible (and most likely) answer is that it contains proof that he was a foreign citizen.

Let me show you today how Congress protected him from both sides of the aisle and guaranteed the
debate would never go too far.
In 1975 a representative named Joe Bingham introduced an amendment to remove the “natural born citizen” constitutional requirement to become President.
Why is that important?
Because it was not until almost 30 years later that the issue would be addressed again. And it was not addressed only once, but multiple times. This is all part of congressional record.

Remarkably, it just so happened to coincide with the meteoric rise of a man named Barack Obama who would benefit greatly from the happenings by gaining his spot in the Oval Office.
I am about to share with you a brilliant piece of research from the Article II Political Action Committee. After reading it the foremost question on my mind is, “If the natural born citizen definition only requires one citizen parent then why did they seemingly try so hard to change the law for Barack Obama?”
There are multiple links to official congressional documents throughout, contained in the research below, so I would urge you to draw your own conclusions.
But from my point of view this research either strongly, or at least partly, validates the following conclusions:

1. Barack Obama was hand-picked to be President.
2. Some members of Congress, on both sides, understood that Obama was not “natural born” and tried to pass laws to pave the way for his arrival.
3. In the end they used a deflection tactic to shine light on John McCain’s eligibility status, hoping that Obama’s own status would not be brought into question.

It appears to have worked.
Below is a lengthy excerpt from “Article II Facts” hosted on the site of the Article II Political Action Committee. If you like what you read, I would encourage you to consider a donation to their cause.
Let’s take a trip back through recent history:

Attempts to redefine or amend Article II “natural born Citizen” Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment underH.J.R. 33: which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”
Bingham’s first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33: in 1977 under H.J.R. 38:, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.
Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…
1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59: in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].
2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128: – “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]
4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104: – “Constitutional Amendment – “Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.”  – No co-sponsors.
5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2: to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor
7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678: on February 28, 2008 – “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)
From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.
In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.
Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511: – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]
S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;” – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)
However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – “Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States; – Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;”
The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of “is” is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an “unconstitutional” resident of the people’s White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.
Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.
The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.
The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president. [SOURCE CREDIT]

There you have it. Make of this what you will.
It raises many questions.
Would people like Claire McCaskill and Hillary Clinton really come to John McCain’s aid if they did not have an ulterior motive?
Why were people like Inhofe, Issa, and Rohrabacher either sponsoring or co-sponsoring these pieces of legislation? After all, these men were later three of Obama’s biggest critics. We heard lots of threats and promises from them that yielded no results. Could it be that these men are just more shining examples of “all bark and no bite”? (See Definition of “Smoke and Mirrors“)
If it is true that the definition of “natural born citizen” only involves having one citizen parent then why all the fuss?
Obama, questionable Hawaii birth certificate and all, met the requirement of one American citizen parent. Maybe the truth is that it takes more than that and Congress knew it.
So why was nothing ever done?
Keep searching and settle for nothing less than the truth.
Dean Garrison is the Publisher at DC Clothesline and DC Dirty Laundry.

Algore predicted an ice-free North Pole in 5-7 years.

Here is his prediction:https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/12/14/ten-years-ago-algore-predicted-the-north-pole-would-be-ice-free-in-5-years/

Newsflash: IT DID NOT HAPPEN!

The civil war unfolds.

America, the Deep State is coming after our president: What are we going to do about it?

Posted on December 10, 2018 in Conspiracy, Constitution, Courts, Crime, Current Events, Deep State, Democrats, Department of Justice, Executive Branch, FBI, Federal Court, Impeachment, Politics, President Donald Trump, President Obama, scandal, Special Counsel// 4 Comments

Save

inShare

(National Sentinel) Crisis: Over the weekend the cable news shows were filled with politicians Left and Right pontificating about what special counsel Robert Mueller’s latest filings on Friday regarding President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen really mean.

The pontificating went into hyperdrive following the publication of a column by former national security prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, in which he predicted that the president is about to be indicted by the Southern District of New York for “campaign finance violations.”

Impeachment! the Democrats screamed. Impeachment! As if they weren’t already considering it, without cause or reason.

McCarthy wrote:

The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.

Specifically, we’re to believe that the payment of “hush money” to a couple of women whom POTUS has denied having a sexual relationship is the same as if he had written a check — illegally — to a campaign in excess of the $2,700 personal limit.

That’s a stretch of the most extreme kind, but far be it from us to dispute McCarthy’s legal analysis, which is substantial, or his opinion regarding an impending indictment, which is believable when you consider that the Mueller probe has always been about one thing, and that is ‘getting Donald Trump.’

Never mind that, as he pointed out, the Obama campaign was found to have been “guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case,” as McCarthy wrote, or that it was “quietly” handled without a prosecution but instead a $375,000 fine.

Never mind that attorney-client privilege only matters in cases not involving Donald Trump’s personal lawyers.

Never mind that non-disclosure agreements are only legally binding if you didn’t sign them with a president whose last name is Trump.

Never mind that fact that the Justice Department, whom Mueller works for, has a long-standing policy that a president cannot be indicted while in office.

Never mind that Mueller’s original mandate — find “Russian collusion” — was never really Mueller’s original mandate, else Hillary Clinton would have been charged a month after Mueller was appointed.

And speaking of that appointment, never mind that the Justice Department official who did it — Rod Rosenstein — talked of “wearing a wire” to catch POTUS Trump in some sort of buffoonish rant so that he could be removed via the 25th Amendment.

None of that matters because, as McCarthy pointed out, “it has been obvious for some time that President Trump is the principal subject” of investigations in the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office and in Mueller’s special counsel orbit, considering that Mueller handed off the Cohen case to the SDNY in the first place.

What else is obvious by now to anyone who can rub a pair of brain cells together is that ‘the system’ — call it the Deep State if you want — is gearing up to dispose of a duly-elected president simply because they did not pre-approve of and choose him, with this message to anyone else who is considering replicating the Trump victory: “Don’t, or you, too, will be destroyed.”

Our founders painstakingly devised and implemented a form of government that was nearly perfect. It empowered people over politics; the masses over political machines.

But the system they bequeathed us depended on moral, upstanding men and women to ensure it functioned as it was designed, as well as an educated, engaged populace to serve as a check and balance on abuses of power.

We’re seeing abuse of power before our very eyes, but it’s not coming from the president of the United States. Rather, it’s being employed against him.

Mueller was never appointed to investigate true crimes because if he was, the conga line of criminals beginning with is buddy James Comey and streaming through the FBI and DoJ, leading straight to Barack Obama’s feet would have already been charged and wearing prison orange.

If Mueller and Co. are permitted to overturn the will of the people and the electoral process with an indictment that has so clearly been manufactured out of thin air, then what will the next “enemy” president be charged with (that would be VP Mike Pence, by the way)? And the next after him?

Americans cannot allow the Deep State to dispose of our duly-elected president, for if we do, he won’t be the last one. He’ll just be the first.

We don’t doubt Andrew McCarthy. We doubt that there is enough integrity left in ‘the system’ to stand in the way of a clear miscarriage of justice.

So that leaves We the People as POTUS Trump’s final line of defense. All he need do is call us forth.

Let’s hope we are up to the task, for if we are not, the Republic, truly, is lost.

Citizens DEFEND THE REPUBLIC!

Civil War is Brewing: Prepare for President Trump to call upon American citizens to defend the Republic

December 10, 2018 Mike Adams Videos 0

Share39

Tweet

(Natural News) Even though Robert Mueller is repeatedly indicting former Trump associates for lying to the government — a “process crime” – James Comey just gave testimony to Congress in which he lied hundreds of times. Yet nothing has happened to James Comey (yet).

President Trump may soon be indicted for “campaign finance violations,” warn lawless Democrats, yet Hillary Clinton pre-sold White House influence to foreign oligarchs for hundreds of millions of dollars on the assumption that Democrats had successfully stolen the 2016 election. Why are there no arrests of Clinton Foundation associates or Hillary Clinton herself?

Robert Mueller’s entire appointment to special counsel was based on a LIE and an illegally leaked memo from James Comey himself, a friend and associate of Robert Mueller, who served as the FBI director when Hillary Clinton’s Uranium One scandal was deliberately swept under the rug, allowing U.S. uranium resources to be funneled to Russia and Iran. Yet, somehow, Robert Mueller, James Comey, Hillary Clinton and even Barack Obama — who carried out massive international money laundering to fly actual pallets of cash to the Iranian regime — are all apparently immune to scrutiny or prosecution. Only Trump associates are accused of crimes, while the real criminals of America — the deep state — appear to be immune to any prosecution or investigation

The deep state Democrats, it turns out, have criminalized politics. No crimes committed by Democrats are investigated or prosecuted, yet Republicans are condemned as criminals merely for engaging in conservative, pro-America politics. (Read the book The Russia Hoax by Gregg Jarrett, or Spygate by Dan Bongino, for an astonishing overview of the damning evidence against the deep state.)

How the deep state could be exposed and dismantled

Soon, that situation may be turned on its head. President Trump is holding all the cards right now, sitting on mountains of currently classified evidence that reveal a pattern of deep, deliberate criminality and treason among deep state operatives like Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, James Comey, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Brennan and others. At the right moment, President Trump is likely to declassify and release a tsunami of once-secret documents that reveal the truth about the FISA warrant fraud, Obama’s abuse of government power, Hillary’s treasonous corruption and selling of government influence, treason within the DOJ and FBI, and much more.

This will be the most significant document dump in the history of the Republic. It will reveal a pattern of astonishing criminality, deception and lawlessness by deep state operatives like Mueller, Comey, Obama and Clinton.

But are there enough honest people still remaining in the bureaucracy to call for the arrest and prosecution of those deep state criminals when the truth comes out?

Perhaps there are. The evidence will be damning. Huber and Horowitz have not been idle, and now that a new Attorney General is on the way, the “good” people inside the FBI and DOJ who have been silenced for years have an actionable channel to pursue the criminal indictments of bad actors who have committed numerous felony crimes, including treason. But regardless of what happens at the federal level, Trump has another card to play as a last resort if the deep state criminals somehow avoid arrest: Activating the citizens to defend the Republic by confronting and defeating the deep state.

How President Trump could call upon the citizenry to defend America against an illegal political coup run by a lawless anti-America mafia

President Trump may already be aware of this, but there are millions of patriotic citizens ready to aid in his defense of America. They are unlikely to act without authorization, however. To take action, they will need to be granted presidential authority.

If activated by the President in defense of the nation, they would rally in Washington D.C. and assist Trump-appointed Federal Marshals (or other law enforcement officials) in locating and arresting deep state traitors throughout the bureaucracy, including those currently committing treason inside the FBI, DOJ and DHS.

Trump would merely need to reactivate all former federal officials and former military personnel, all of whom have sworn an oath to “protect and defend the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” That oath is a lifetime oath; it does not expire just because you retire or leave federal service. Further, the limitations of posse comitatus do not restrict the deployment of active duty military personnel on U.S. soil if defending the nation against enemy combatants operating within the United States. Thus, Trump could also deploy Military Police or even active duty military personnel to seek out and arrest enemy combatants who are operating inside the U.S. government.

For the record, those “enemy combatants” must include a long list of currently-serving U.S. Senators and House Representatives who are anti-America communists. Almost all of them pretend to be “socialists” or “democratic socialists,” but they all have the same goal: The overthrow of the American republic and a sweeping new authoritarian, communist government in charge of everything. See the film “Enemies Within” by Trevor Louden for a detailed list of who needs to be arrested, indicted and prosecuted.

Why deep state traitors are enemy combatants

Deep state traitors such as Robert Mueller and Barack Obama can arguably be designated enemy combatants by the President. There is more than enough evidence to be declassified that clearly supports this designation. For example, Obama directly financed the nuclear weapons program of Iran, the world’s No. 1 state sponsor of terrorism and a sworn enemy of the United States. Robert Mueller had a hand in funneling uranium to Iran, through Russia, while launching the “Russia hoax” investigation to clear Hillary Clinton while falsely accusing President Trump of almost the exact crimes that Democrats have committed.

Furthermore, a rational person could argue that the Founding Fathers of America have already authorized the citizens to rise up against tyranny when treasonous criminals seize control of the bureaucracy and weaponize the government against the People. The Second Amendment, in particular, was clearly written for the purpose of arming the citizenry as a means to confront and halt the usurpation of power by corrupt government that has become weaponized against the People. Thus, concerned citizens who see their country under siege from within are already well aware that they may be called upon to restore the rule of law by defeating the deep state criminals who have set it aside for their own quest for absolute power.

To be clear, I personally hope we never see blood spilled in any power struggle in the United States. The preferable solution to all this is that the “wheels of justice” would expose the real criminals, and the media would report the truth about shine the light of transparency on the crimes of the Clintons, Obamas and their underlings who represent a “political mafia” deep state. But we all know that’s likely impossible. The media is run by the deep state. The “wheels of justice” are controlled by traitors. Every institution upon which reasonable people might rely to honor the rule of law has been compromised — even overrun — by deep state traitors.

The idea that the deep state will investigate and indict itself for the crimes it has committed against America is absurd. The lawless bureaucrats have achieved so much control over the government, the media and even the internet that there is likely no defeating them from within. It seems apparent that the only way to defeat the deep state is for the citizens to be called upon to support a small, loyal federal task force in arresting, indicting and prosecuting the traitors who have very nearly overthrown the rule of law and turned America into a banana republic.

Will President Trump call upon the citizenry to defend America against the deep state? Will the deep state successfully impeach or even assassinate the President before he can take such actions? Would an impeachment of Trump set off a citizens’ revolt anyway? These are important questions for us all to consider.

In my podcast today, I discuss why the activation of citizens to defend the Republic is legal and justified under the U.S. Constitution. I also argue that it may be needed in order to restore law and order to a nation where lawlessness and tyranny have run amok, and where the treasonous criminals remain in charge of nearly everything. The only way to defeat them may be for the people to join forces with the President to take America back from those who actively seek to destroy it.

Hear the full podcast at:

Brighteon.com/5976471389001

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes threatens to run for President.

The following dialog took place between this NY snowflake and a photographer:

OVERHEARD Thursday at a POLITICO photoshoot at Harvard: REP.-ELECT ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D-N.Y.) joking about running for president. PHOTOG: “What are you, twenty…?” AOC: “29. I just turned 29.” PHOTOG: “Happy birthday.” AOC: “Thank you! Thank you!” PHOTOG: “You can’t even run for president for another six years.”

AJ adds: The Framers of the Constitution were wise to exclude young snowflakes from the Presidency. At least for a while. Who knows she might learn something between now and then. If even the Chinese Communists have learned that Socialism leads to failure then....Pardon me for ocasio optimism. On the other hand, this young person has amassed a record for dimness even before she is "inaugurated."

Is gold price manipulation coming to an end?

I know, I know... this is not the first time we have heard this (and repeated it here). BUT!! There are signs that the tide is turning. What are these signs?

1. The bouillon banks are turning positive in what kind of futures they hold;
2. Traders from big banks are beginning to plead guilty to price manipulation;
3. The Basel III agreement monitizes gold.

Listen to an interview with London whistleblower. What is the inside scoop?

https://kingworldnews.com/andrew-maguire-12-8-2018/

Powerful countries are up to their ears in debt. One way of reducing that burden is to stoke up some inflation so money borrowed will be repaid with (admittedly) cheaper money.

Look for gold to close above $1,250 next week. One Prognosticator predicts that gold prices will accede previous highs in 50 trading days. Yeah, yeah. I SEE dem flying pigs.

American provocations on Russia's doorstep.

American fighter planes were sent to the Ukraine and engaged in joint maneuvers on the Russian border.

Pres Poroshenko was quoted that Ukraine can invite anyone they feel  and manuever anywhere they please within their territory. True enough. But, what if their planes mistakenly cross the Russian border or appear near to doing it, Would the Russians have the right to shoot them down?

These kind of activities are fraught with danger and I am disappointed that President Trump is sucked into such actions. So far the Russians shrug this off as political posturing, but what if they take it as a hostile, military action?

ADVICE: Do not kick a sleeping bear!!!