And propaganda display at home.

The Left staged one here, too. I refer to the so-called March for our life." It was a classic. First, it was paid for by the usual coterie of rich Leftists. Second, it used the Florida students as a prop. Only ten percent of the marchers were the students, the rest were the bitter collection of femi-Nazis still protesting the last election.

The march produced a new icon for the radical Left: Mr Hogg. The 17 year old is a fully formed Leftist all set to intimidate those who disagree with him through attacks on FOX and boycotts.

Like Mario Savio before him, Mr Hogg is a fully formed radical. What does he want? He wants "elections" where anyone can vote without an identity check. He wants ever more odious legislation to restrict gun rights until we give up in disgust and let the Left maneuver us through demonstrations and Media propaganda plus brainwashing in school. The Media loved it.

Propaganda display on Gaza border.

• Of course, Gazan Muslims do this on the eve of Passover. The non-Muslim world is forever berated about respect and supremacism of Islam and its holidays. But for the infidel, it is most opportune for jihad warfare (Christmas jihad attacks, Yom Kippur war etc).

Close to ten thousand Muslims are rioting, throwing projectiles, rocks, attacking Israeli Defense forces in multiple locations along the security border fence with Gaza, with thousands more streaming to the tent camps.

They are rioting for “right to return”. In other words, the destruction of Israel.

UPDATE: Dozens of Muslim terrorists attempted to breach the border fence with Gaza, were shot by IDF forces securing the border. Injuries reported.

Caroline Glick wrote if this impending propaganda stunt here:

On Friday, the Palestinian terror group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, is inaugurating what it is calling “The March of Return.”

According to Hamas’s leadership, the “March of Return” is scheduled to run from March 30 – the eve of Passover — through May 15, the 70th anniversary of Israel’s establishment. According to Israeli media reports, Hamas has budgeted $10 million for the operation.

Throughout the “March of Return,” Hamas intends to send thousands of civilians to the Israeli border. Hamas is planning to set up tent camps along the border fence and then, presumably, order participants to overrun it on May 15. The Palestinians refer to May 15 as “Nakba,” or Catastrophe Day.

The first question that observers of this spectacle need to ask themselves is whether Hamas believes that it will be able to overrun Israel.

The obvious answer is, of course it doesn’t.

So this brings us to the second question.

If Hamas doesn’t expect its civilians to overrun Israel, what is it trying to accomplish by sending them into harm’s way? Why it the terror group telling Gaza residents to place themselves in front of the border fence and challenge Israeli security forces charged with defending Israel?

The answer here is also obvious. Hamas intends to provoke Israel to shoot at the Palestinian civilians it is sending to the border. It is setting its people up to die because it expects their deaths to be captured live by the cameras of the Western media, which will be on hand to watch the spectacle.

In other words, Hamas’s strategy of harming Israel by forcing its soldiers to kill Palestinians is predicated on its certainty that the Western media will act as its partner and ensure the success of its lethal propaganda stunt.

Democrat conspiracy against Trump is deep.

from Powerline:

Posted on March 29, 2018 by John Hinderaker in 2016 Presidential Election, Russia investigation Edit This

The Democratic Party Collusion Story Gets Worse

We have barely begun to plumb the depths of the scandal arising out of the 2016 presidential election. James Comey, John Brennan, Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS, the DNC, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Perkins Coie law firm, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, unknown Russians, Andrew McCabe–the list goes on and on, and it keeps getting longer.

The latest report comes from Congressional investigators, via Fox News:

Newly uncovered text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page suggest a possible coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in the early stages of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to GOP congressional investigators on Wednesday.

The investigators say the information provided to Fox News “strongly” suggests coordination between former President Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan — which they say would “contradict” the Obama administration’s public stance about its hand in the process.

The texts indicate that Strzok and Page knew their actions were illegal or, at a bare minimum, improper, and intended to keep them safe from FOIA requests or Congressional investigations. (To be fair, this was standard practice in the Obama administration.)

Page texted Strzok on Aug. 2, 2016, saying: “Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign. Just thinking about congress, foia, etc. You probably know better than me.”

The White House was involved in the Democrats’ plans from an early date, contrary to Barack Obama’a public claims:

Days later, on Aug. 8, 2016, Strzok texted Page: “Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be pulled. I’d let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before the Wed WH session.”

In the texts, “D” referred to FBI Director James Comey, and and “McDonough” referred to Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, the GOP investigators said.

So Obama’s White House was in on the FBI’s machinations more or less from the start.

The congressional investigators pointed out to Fox News that the CIA and FBI are supposed to be “independent agencies,” and noted that “coordination between political actors at the White House and investigators would be inappropriate,” raising questions about the level of involvement of Obama White House officials.

But that’s not all. Democrats at the CIA and the FBI brought Senate Democrats into the act as well:

But weeks later, on August 25, 2016, Brennan went to Capitol Hill to brief Harry Reid — and it was unclear whether FBI officials attended the briefing, a congressional source told Fox News.

Two days after the briefing, Reid penned a letter to Comey requesting an investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Harry Reid was the Senate Minority Leader at the time. Did John Brennan brief the Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, as well? Is there any acceptable reason why he would share information only with the Senate minority? In any event, Brennan’s meeting with Reid had the desired effect, as Reid wrote James Comey–who presumably was in on the plan all along–requesting an FBI “collusion” investigation. This, I assume, was done to provide cover. Reid likely wasn’t told that the requested investigation had already been going on since July.

Strocz and Page commented on the significance of Reid’s letter:

The following day, Aug. 30, 2016, Strzok texted Page: “Here we go,” sending a link to the Times report titled, “Harry Reid Cites Evidence of Russian Tampering in U.S. Vote and seeks FBI inquiry.”

Page replied: “D [Comey] said at am brief that Reid called him and told him he would be sending a letter.”

Congressional investigators suggested that the Reid letter possibly provided “cover” for the fact that the FBI and Justice Department had already begun investigating the Trump campaign in mid-July on what they called “questionable ethical and legal grounds.”

“The ‘here we go’ text between Strzok and Page indicates the FBI/ DOJ knew the letter from Reid was coming,” a congressional source told Fox News. “This created the inference they knew it would create public calls for an investigation into Russian interference — covering them.”

The Democrats planned to block Donald Trump from being elected, and to destroy his administration in the event that he won, by fabricating and distributing false claims of cooperation between the Trump campaign and the Russians. The irony is that despite the fact that the Democrats’ scheme has now been exposed, it is still being carried out and has been quite successful.

How the FED is trying to crash the economy.

"

As the US fed pushes rates higher, more and more consumers will be pushed to their financial limit that will drive some level of economic contraction.  It is almost like the US fed has no understanding of supply and demand functions as related to their policies.  As they push the rates higher trying to front-run inflationary concerns, they don’t understand that many borrowers can’t sustain raising rates at this pace.  In the process, many borrowers will be pushed into foreclosure and possibly bankruptcy as the fed attempts to normalize rate levels.

As traders, our job is to find the opportunity that exists and to try to capitalize on price movements and from swings in valuations that occur throughout this game.  The US fed and global central banks will do what they do – we really don’t have any control over them or their decisions.  As traders, our job is to be ahead of these central banks and take advantage of the opportunities they provide to us.

We likely still have many months of preparation to further understand and develop our strategies for these future moves.  We invite you to visit www.TheTechnicalTraders.com to learn what we do and why we believe we offer the best research and analysis available to traders"

AG Sessions must limit Mueller's scope.

ANALYSIS: Constitution Compels Sessions Dismiss Mueller From Non-Campaign Cases

by Robert Barnes | 7:31 am, March 28th, 2018

        

 

       

Paul Manafort‘s legal team brought a motion to dismiss on Tuesday, noting that Rosenstein could not appoint Mueller to any investigation outside the scope of the 2016 campaign since Sessions did not recuse himself for anything outside the campaign. I agree with this take on Mueller’s authority. If we follow that argument that would mean Sessions himself has exclusive authority to appoint a special counsel for non-collusion charges, and Sessions has taken no such action. Sessions himself should make that clear to Mueller, rather than await court resolution. Doing so would remove three of the four areas of inquiry from Mueller’s requested interview with President Trump.

Sessions formally notifying Mueller that he does not have authority to act outside of campaign-related cases and cases related to obstruction of Mueller’s investigation would be doing what the Constitution compels: enforcing the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Additionally, Sessions notifying Mueller that he does not have authority to act outside of campaign-related cases would be exercising Sessions’ court-recognized Constitutional obligation to “direct and supervise litigation” conducted by the Department of Justice. Furthermore, Sessions notifying Mueller that he does not have authority to act outside of campaign-related cases protects against the inappropriate use of the federal grand jury that defendant Manafort now rightly complains about.

Sessions limiting Mueller to the 2016 campaign would also be restoring confidence in democratic institutions, and restore public faith that democratically elected officials.

One thing to remember about Sessions’ recusal: Sessions only recused himself from “any existing or future investigations of any matters related in any way to the campaigns for President of the United States.” This recusal letter limits the scope of Sessions’ recusal to the 2016 campaigns; it does not authorize Sessions’ recusal for anything beyond that. Constitutionally, Sessions has a “duty to direct and supervise litigation” conducted by the Department of Justice. Ethically, professionally, and legally, Sessions cannot ignore his supervisory obligations for cases that are not related to the “campaigns for President.”

Second, the Constitution’s Appointment Clause requires the democratic process control the appointment of all but “inferior” officers. This means there can be no principal executive branch officer except those the President personally appoints and the Senate advises and consents to. There is probably no greater domestic power of the executive branch than the power to access a grand jury to indict someone, the power to access a grand jury to subpoena someone’s testimony and records, the power to access the tax records of any individual in the country, the power to request warrants to spy on someone’s activity or search it and seize it, or the power to simply threaten any of the above to an individual American. That is why that power must be limited to principal, democratically-appointed officers. The special counsel, when not appointed by the President, cannot act legally except as an “inferior” officer, strictly limited to the jurisdictional subject matter limits of his appointment and supervisory power of those above him that have been directly, democratically appointed by democratically elected officials.  As a federal district court held: “the special counsel cannot act outside the bounds of either his limited jurisdiction or without regard for Department of Justice policies and regulations. As such, the Special Counsel does not wield unlimited authority.” Indeed, a special counsel’s “authority is therefore confined to the narrow objective of accomplishing the specific mandate he was given.”

Third, Sessions limiting Mueller would enforce the limits intended on Rosenstein’s letter authorization. Contrary to anti-Trump critics, Mueller’s mandate was not “get Trump,” “indict anybody who ever worked for Trump.” Mueller’s authority is limited to “links between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.” Any subject matter that does not concern “the campaign,” is a subject matter that Sessions Constitutionally must directly supervise Mueller. This includes Sessions power to notify Mueller and formally revoke Mueller’s authority at any time in cases that do not concern the campaign itself. Sessions can remove Mueller’s authority to request search warrants, subpoena grand jury testimony, subpoena grand jury records, target individuals, or issue indictments unless the subject matter is constricted to the campaign itself. Sessions can return power over the existing indictments to regular DOJ prosecutors, as both the Constitution and the statutes compel. Sessions can dismiss existing indictments as an excess of authority of Mueller’s team (a team already infamous for acting outside their authority in the past, whether it be ethical abuses or over-broad, unconstitutional interpretations of federal criminal law).

Fourth, Sessions taking formal notice of his authority would remedy what some saw as an over broad authorization by Rosenstein. One argument for Mueller investigating 2005 tax crimes and 2010 bank fraud crimes and 2013 foreign agent crimes was that Rosenstein authorized Mueller to investigate all crimes that “directly arise” from the investigation. As some legal critics noted, there were always two problems with this interpretation of Rosenstein’s authorization: first, if it could be interpreted so broadly, it would make Mueller a de facto Attorney General of the United States, which the Appointments Clause does not permit, rendering such an authorization in violation; second, if it could be interpreted as broadly as Mueller has done so, then it failed to conform to the statutes and regulations governing special counsel authorizations. Regardless, Sessions retaking his authority formally would render the issue moot. Why? Because Rosenstein himself did not have the authority to create a special counsel for anything beyond the areas Sessions recused himself.

In sum, Sessions notifying Mueller he does not have authority to act on non-campaign related investigations would restore Mueller’s special counsel’s office to its intended Constitutional constrictions, remove the Beria-style investigative techniques witnessed over the past year, and restore public faith that our Constitutional democracy is still a Constitutional democracy. It would also prove Sessions is more than as Trump calls him — Mr. Magoo.

Robert Barnes is a California-based trial attorney whose practice focuses on Constitutional, criminal and civil rights law. You can follow him at @Barnes_Law.

[Image via AFP/Getty Images]

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.

Anti gun people are idiotic.

Prize example is the woman who asks "if I can buy an AR-15 what's to stop me about getting an atomic bomb?" And she is a teacher!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCHSSdjcnow&feature=youtu.be

For those who thought the Omnibus was the end of Trump. Enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3_xiUYMnXA

Has Trump outsmarted the Congress?

Trump wins again! He totally hosed Congress by signing the Omnibus spending bill. Wall is funded, construction begins Monday

• by Thomas Madison
• March 26, 2018
   

While this Omnibus spending bill may allow for far too much discretionary spending on pork, it is also a classic Trump win. Let me explain.

While Congress has been playing checkers, President Trump has been playing chess, and it appears he has outsmarted the career parasites on Capitol Hill again.

Many pundits believe that President Trump ensured that he is a one-term president by signing the Omnibus spending bill.

Maybe not. It appears the president was very much on his game when signing the bill that denied him the expected funding for his border wall, and Rinos and Democrats were seen partying in the streets in response to President Trump’s reluctant signing of the steaming pile of legislation, believing they had majorly screwed the president and any hope he had of re-election.

They should have read up on the authority of an omnibus spending bill, which unlike an official congressional budget, gives the president much wider discretion for use of the funds. Additionally, the president has the authority to redirect funding from one part of the bill to another in the interest of national security, which President Trump has done, taking over $16 billion from State Department “foreign operations” funding and using it to build his much-anticipated border wall. President Trump announced Friday after signing the omnibus bill that wall construction begins Monday, March 26.

When asked about the border wall on Friday, the president replied, “We’re going to be starting work literally on Monday. We have a lot of money coming to the border.”

What will President Trump do about the provision in the bill that prohibits using any funds to build a border wall? Apparently he is going to ignore it, as an omnibus bill is more guideline than directive.

You may recall how Barack Hussein spent money never earmarked, like $33 billion to Iran, $1.7 billion of which was in cash ransom, palletized and flown to Tehran before Iran released the hostages. For the record, less than $2 billion in Iranian assets in the US were frozen. Hussein apparently directed the Treasury to release the money to Iran, leaving the accountants to worry about the accounting. That is why Obama never signed a single budget during his disastrous eight years in office. All spending was by continuing resolution or omnibus spending bills, giving him great latitude as to how and where the money was spent.

From Reddit

FOR THOSE DOUBTING TRUMP DO YOUR RESEARCH Jo Ann Powell Neely Gunny says: March 23, 2018 at 7:42 am I seriously do not understand why individuals do not read the entire thread or disregard it.

Wheatietoo and I spent hours yesterday providing links, researching the laws, the 1974 law and statutes…. Do you know why the Omnibus is not going to get any notice…Here it is..

It’s not an official ‘Federal Budget’. It’s an Omnibus bill…not a Budget…He outsmarted them again…Congress basically screwed themselves by not passing a Budget…

Per the Constitution…the President must adhere to a Budget set forth by Congress and direct the expenditures as provided therein.

This is another one of those big Porkulus Bills, like they gave Obama for 8 years. This is not a Budget..

An Omnibus Spending Bill may have some ‘instructions’ as to how the money will be spent…but Obama ignored them. He spent the money, or didn’t spend it, however he wanted to. And Congress didn’t do a thing about it! Because they couldn’t..

I think our President observed how this happened, year after year. He is bound to realize that those ‘appropriations’ for different things in these Omnibus bills…are merely ‘suggestions’.

So like Obama, Pres Trump can spend this money on whatever he wants to. Or…not spend it.

Planned Parenthood? What if our President decided to tell the Treas Dept to ‘slow-walk’ that money to Planned Parenthood…until the Senate gets off their ass and confirms his appointees?

Sanctuary Cities? What if our President decided to ‘slow-walk’ that money too…until those Sanctuary Cities assist ICE in rounding up criminal illegal aliens?

Splodey heads? From the Dems and the Enemedia? Why yes. There would be a colorful display of splodey heads.

But what could they do about it. Hah.

Our President could just say…’What! Congress should’ve passed a Budget.’

done finished…research was done…and it is so very humorous actually….our VSG..just said just give me money for the military and the wall…put anything else you want in it…and those goofballs did.

In this case, as per above….he doesn’t have to spend a dime….because it is not a budget…and even if it was…researched….he could still spend as he please… Congress appropriates….up to the President to spend it…or not….as he pleases..

If anyone disagrees, I can go back and get the links and evidence, but if you just read yesterdays political thread…Wheatietoo and I laid it all out for all…Wheatietoo did most of the work and put together the consolidated update as per above….

Again, that is why Obama never had a Budget in his Presidency…Congress did continual Omibus’s and he just took the money….for 8 years…and no one seems to know where it went…

In a letter to Congress just after signing the bill, President Trump declared that he was rescinding a part of the bill….

…. and using $16 billion of funding appropriated for State Department foreign operations (“division K”) as an “emergency requirement” (to build the wall), as noted in the president’s second letter to Congress explaining where the money is being taken from ….

 

Erdogan: Is he ...?

the coming anti-Christ?

Turks claim Mosul, Kurdish towns , Greece, Bulgaria and Jerusalem as theirs. Will they invade Northern Israel? The Israelis better start mowing the fields of Megiddo where the forces of the anti-Christ will be annihilated.

http://www.kurdistan24.net/en/news/faebbbf5-0252-48de-98db-fc2335446ebc

Will there be Jewish kolbasz?

Yes. Israeli rabbis declared that genetically engineered pig meat if kosher even with milk.

Why China MUST be confronted!!

President Trump asked the Chinese to reduce their trade balance with us by $100B/year. In addition, Pres Trump is proposing to stop the Chinese from ripping us off in their dealings with us. Maria Bartiromo described this morning how the Chinese are harming us.

The Chinese are buying up companies with new technologies, including some tech needed for defense. American companies trying to set up subsidiaries in China must surrender their technology to the Chinese government and can only own 49% of the joint venture. The Chinese then can take over the company and produce the goods with cheap labor and undercut our companies. Thie is not free trade, it is piracy.

Trump's gamble: the $1.3 Trillion boondoggle.

Congress voted to do an equivalent of the Mueller investigation. It is geared to stymie the Trump agenda. Money for the Wall? Nada. The invasion of the US will continue. Even Planned Parenthood, the trafficker of baby body parts, will get $500 Million. All for what? A measly $60 Billion more for the US Armed forces. Reagan was conned thus, he even agreed to a tax increase.

Pelosi and Schumer were doing verbal cart wheels after the deed, thinking they got away with making the Trump Presidency irrelevant. Extra ICE agents? No. Cutting funds for designated programs  Trump wants to end? No. And so on.

Meanwhile, Congress snuck out of town, so it would not have to confront a potential veto.

The betrayal by the Congress and Congressional leaders is a trick to discourage Republicans in the Fall.

But wait! Trump says he won't do this again. And the budget law will end on Sep 30. Meanwhile, get ready for the takedown of the Deep State.

Silver: Bullion banks are most bullish.

Here is a graph of the position of the bullion banks:

 

 

 

Generally speaking, the bullion banks are always short. The graph shows that shorts increased during the rally of 2010-2011. That brought silver down. The bullion banks then tried to crash silver  in recent years, but they were unsuccessful. They have recently covered record short positions and are now the most bullish in years. They are expecting a rally in silver - all the while discouraging the investors.

 

We have had a short rally in the precious metals. Is this the long-awaited rally? The experts tell us that if gold closes above 1,400, it is.

Market changes are real.

The FED activity has finally has an effect. The first action is on the Stock Market. Here is the graph of the DOW:

 

 

We see a breakdown of a flag formation in the DOW.

We also see a rise in gold.The bouillon banks have covered their shorts in silver and a goodly part in gold. Here is the rise in gold prices:

 

 

Routing the Deep State.

A cabal of civil servants set out to overthrow the presidency of Donald Trump. These people can be divided into two groups: group 1 is the people who are high enough in the government - they can be fired or demoted fairly simply. Then there are those in the Civil Service whose firing is much more complicated. In the second case, Management must prove that the individuals failed to meet their required performance level, then they must be given specific tasks to survive. If they fail to meet their tasks then they can be fired.

The Deep State has survived for over a year. Their members  McCabe, Strzok, Yates, Ohr, Page, Preistap, Baker, Comey, Rybicki were *actively* spying on Team Trump via the … Carter Page title 1 FISA warrant, they were actively running a case to frame the Attorney General of the U.S.

Mccane and Comey have been fired, the others are put in limbo jobs. The OIG of the Justice Dept has investigated and he is working with a Prosecutor. Will the swampsters be indicted and tried? Onlytime will tell. The OIG reprt will come out in April, maybe May.

The weather mocks Algore.

Wind chills 50 to 60 degrees below zero were recorded in the Dakotas in the beginning of the week, while the coldest temperature was a reading of 45 degrees below zero in Embarrass, Minnesota, early Sunday

You don'tthink it is getting later and later?

WND

Rabbi reads Trump into Bible

President compared to ancient king who helped Jews

 

 

Half shekel (Image from Hamikdash.org, which is selling the coins)

It was only last month that Israel’s re-constituted Sanhedrin honored President Donald Trump, who had recognized Jerusalem as the nation’s capital and announced plans to move the U.S. Embassy there, by placing his image on a privately minted coin, alongside Persian King Cyrus.

Cyrus, according to Britannica, was a pagan king who liberated the Jews from captivity in Babylon, allowed them to return to their homeland and even facilitated the construction of a Temple.

A short time after the coin wa issued, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu likened Trump to Cyrus.

“I want to tell you that the Jewish people have a long memory, so we remember the proclamation of the great King Cyrus the Great — Persian King,” Netanyahu told Trump at the White House. “Twenty-five hundred years ago, he proclaimed that the Jewish exiles in Babylon can come back and rebuild our temple in Jerusalem.

“And we remember how a few weeks ago, President Donald J. Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. Mr. President, this will be remembered by our people through the ages.”

Trump’s accomplishments have prompted an online Thank Trump Card Campaign giving Americans a way to thank the president for his record of achievement during his first year in office. To take part in the campaign, as have tens of thousands already, simply go to ThankTrump.us to choose one of our 10 unique e-card designs, add a personalized message and send it to the White House.

Now a third authority has connected Trump to Cyrus.

Adam Elihayu Berkowitz reports at Breaking Israel News that Rabbi Yehudah Glick, a member of the Knesset and an activist for the Temple Mount, said those who fail to see “the proclamation of the word of God and the word of the prophecies and the Book of Ezra, a repetition of Cyrus, the King of Persia, should buy himself a new pair of glasses.”

He was presented with one of the fundraising coins and began reading from the Bible, inserting references to President Trump.

Berkowitz reported Glick was “so overcome with emotion that he began to recite from the Bible.”

“But the verses he recited, describing the president’s activities, don’t really exist. The rabbi’s recitation was intended to graphically illustrate how the political events surrounding the U.S. Embassy move and the president’s actions bear a striking resemblance to King Cyrus’ actions in the days of Ezra the Scribe and the Second Temple,” he reported.

Under the headline “Rabbi Yehudah Glick reads Trump into the Bible” is a video with Glick reading: “Now in the first year of Trump, president of the United States of America, that the word of the Lord, by the mouth of our prophets, 70 years after the state of Israel, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Trump, president of the United States, that he made a proclamation throughout all of his kingdom, and put it in writing, saying, thus says Trump, president of the United States of America, The Lord God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the United States of America, and he has charged me to build him an Embassy in Jerusalem which is in Judah.”

Berkowitz reported Glick’s recitation came after he was presented with a coin bearing the images of Trump and Cyrus.

BIN has posted a video online of Glick’s statement.

   

Rabbi Hillel Weiss, spokesman for the Sanhedrin, told BIN, “There is no question that the comparison between Cyrus and Trump, two non-Jewish leaders, is apt.”

Earlier, Berkowitz reported the coin, what the Bible mandates be donated by every Jewish male in the Temple, was to be minted by the Sanhedrin and the Mikdash (Temple) Educational Center.

According to a website dedicated to raising money for the construction of a temple, the coin has an image of Trump on the front and the Holy Temple in Jerusalem on the back.

Also on the front will be an image of the ancient Persian King Cyrus, who was key to the construction of the Second Temple.

The coin also is to recognize Lord Arthur Balfour, the foreign secretary for Britain behind the “Balfour Declaration,” which one century ago called for a Jewish homeland.

Isikoff-Corn book blows Muellerinvestigation to smithereens.

Some of the details of the book by Michael Isikoff and David Corn clearly indicate that Mueller's investigation is fraudulent and this was known to the Reporters from the beginning.

Mueller's investigation aims to discover details that might be embarrassing to Trump, forcing him to resign or for the Republicans to lose this year's election so the Democrats can impeach him. What is wrong with that you might say? What is wrong with this is that it is a corruption of the use of a Special Counsel and the FBI and the DOJ. The Special Counsel and govt agencies are tasked with unearthing crimes within the government (the Special Counsel is appointed because the Agencies can not impartially investigate themselves).

The statutes on the use of the Special Counsel specify that there must be a crime to be investigated by the Special Counsel. What crime was Mueller appointed to investigate? None was specified. Instead, the Mueller investigation's findings  were being leaked to the Media which tries to present the findings in the most partisan way possible. When the details do not fit the narrative, they are invented.

The Obama regime had corrupted the process. How? The regime sabotaged tax exemption status   for organizations that promote political or philosophical ideas contrary to what was being promoted by the Obama regime. That was a corruption of the IRS. But the regime went further. by corrupting the DOJ, the FBI and the FISA Court to spy on its opponents. The Obama regime spied on opponents of the Iran deal and used Fusion GPS to did up dirt on the Romney campaign.

Things took a more serious turn when unexpectedly, the regime's candidate (Hillary Clinton) ran for President and lost. First, the Obama regime spied on the Trump campaign and then tried to delegitimize the winning candidate by corrupting the DOJ and the Independent Counsel statue.

The holdovers from the Obama regime went to the FISA Court and obtained a warrant for surveilling
certain members of the Trump campaign. The FISA Court was told that the Kremlin had compromising evidence that they could use to blackmail Trump. What was this 'compromising evidence?' The Clinton campaign and the DNC retained Fusion GPS (the same group that dished dirt on the Romney campaign) which then "reported" that Trump hired prostitutes to urinate on the bed slept in by the Obamas. This was the notorious "Steele dossier." It was then used as the pretext for surveilling of the Trump campaign and Trump himself.

What were the facts? Trump rented a room in a Moscow hotel and slept there for 5 hours. He made no phone calls from that room and the person that stood guard on the room reported no one but Trump entering or leaving the room all night. In other words, the Steele dossier was a fabrication. The FISA Court was told that the Steele 'dossier' was intelligence, though in reality it was opposition research and fabrication. That was the genesis of the Trump surveillance and later the appointment and start of the  Mueller "investigation."

The process is full of felonious conduct. Republican investigators in Congress demanded a Special Counsel to investigate the crimes committed by the likes of Comey, MacCabe and others.

The railroading of Michael Flynn.

Gen Michael Flynn is an American who served his country long and well. He worked in the Obama regime and was an early supporter of Donald Trump. He got caught up in the unethical machinations of an unethical Special Counsel and had to plead guilty in order to save himself from bankruptcy. As it turned out, Gen Flynn had to sell his house to pay for his legal bills. Swamp lawyers are paid well at $500/hr, so if you have not grown rich in the swamp, your bills mount up.

What happened to Michael Flynn is that  he was National Security advisor to President elect Trump and he began to make contacts with foreign leaders as his job demanded. The swamp then began its attempts to get rid of Trump via the Special Counsel. One of the Conspirators (FBI Agent Strzok) went to the White House and asked to talk to General Flynn. My information indicates that Flynn was not told that the questioning was an official investigation, nor was he represented by a lawyer. Part of the information Flynn gave to Strzok was inaccurate. Strzok did not believe that Flynn was deliberately lying, but in Mueller's hands the interview metastasized into an indictment. Strzok then used his personal contact with a FISA Judge who accepted Flynn's guilty plea.

Ostencively, Mueller was going to use Flynn's guilty plea to force him to turn on Trump and divulge Trump's offences. Except, there is nothing to divulge, because there was no collusion between the campaign and the Kremlin. The procedure is highly unethical and Mueller should be fired. The whole thing is a partisan ploy by swamp dweller Democrats and it must be ended. Mueller had over a year and his unethical conduct did not yield any evidence  of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. It is time to stop the pretense carried on by Mueller that he is investigating  a criminal collusion. Even if there were a collusion, it would not have been a crime.

Mueller and Rosenstein must be fired!!!!

Hillary's falls escalate.

Hillary's falls in India deserve a medical explanation. Look carefully at her behavior on the stairs. She has her weight supported on her right leg and her left leg is in front of her. It does not slip, but kicks out. This happened twice. She then kicked off her sandals to create the narrative that she slipped. But she did not slip but had a convulsive movement. It is obvious if you view the video. The movement is consistent with a neurological disorder; a form of Parkinson's disease. She then had another episode and that time she broke her wrist, i.e. suffered a hairline fracture. One of the effects of Parkinson's is a loss of balance. She should use a walker or a walking stick.

Spy games in Britain.

Here are the facts. Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned in Salisbury, England by a nerve agent novichok. The agent is known to be produced in a Russian lab. Another Russian, Nikolai Grushkov was found strangled. British PM Theresa May expelled a bunch of Russians from the Russian Embassy and the world awaits Russian retaliation.

Jeremy Corbyn, Labor Leader, suggested that the attack may have been a false flag operation. Using novichok is definitely putting a Russian label on the entire affair. And the way the incident is handled is suspicious. First, the British refused a request from Russia to give them of a sample of the novichok so it can be analyzed in Russia.  If the agent is not of Russian manufacture, that might show up in an analysis. The British claim that PM May demanded an explanation from Russia. The ultimatum now passed and the British expelled 23 Russians from the Embassy. The Russians claim that they did not receive the request.

This sounds like a spy novel. But, serious questions remain. Why would the Russians carry out an assassination in such a way that it obviously points to them? And why would someone carry out a false flag operation? One possibility is the voices we hear that the Soccer World Cup should be canceled in Moscow, come this Summer. Petty stuff? Sure. But there are forces that simply hate Russia since Putin and leadership have gone out of their way to revive the Russian Orthodox Church.

On the other hand, we could have some Russians in their Deep State who want to restore Russia as the enemy of the west.

Like I said this sounds like a spy novel. And Theresa May is obviously not able to handle it.

A Wolf mascarading as a Lamb.

The Democrat strategy has been unveiled and successfully tested in Pennsylvania. This fall's election we will see far out radicals in areas controlled by Democrats and pretend 'moderates' elsewhere. Conor Lamb tried to sound like a Conservative, but mark my words that he is not. Meanwhile they will motivate their troops by stoking their rage via the Media. Also, thousands of illegal aliens will be shepherded to the polls. It worked in PA. If the Dems take the House Trump will be impeached. But to remove Trump needs the vote of two thirds of the Senate. That won't happen but we are in a Fourth Turning, which means intensified conflict.

The career choice test.

An old country preacher had a teenage son, and it was getting time to where the boy should give some thought to choosing a profession.

One day, while the boy was away at school, his father decided to try an experiment.

 

 He went into the boy's room and placed on his study table four objects: 

1. A Bible

2. A silver dollar

3. A bottle of whiskey

4. A Playboy magazine.

 

"I'll just hide behind the door," the old preacher said to himself. "When he comes home from school today,

I'll see which object he picks up and is interested in.

 

If it's the Bible, he's going to be a preacher like me, and what a blessing that would be!

 

If he picks up the dollar, he's going to be a business man and that would be okay, too.

 

But if he picks up the bottle, he's going to be a no-good drunken bum, and, Lord, what a shame that would be.

 

And worst of all, if he picks up that magazine he's going to be a skirt-chasing womanizer."

 

The old man waited anxiously, and soon heard his son's footsteps as he entered the house whistling and headed for his room.

The boy tossed his books on the bed, and as he turned to leave the room he spotted the objects on the table.

With curiosity in his eyes, he walked over to inspect them.

 

Finally, he picked up the Bible and placed it under his arm. He picked up the silver dollar and dropped it into his pocket.

He uncorked the bottle and took a big drink, all the while admiring the magazine's centerfold.

 

"Lord have mercy," the old preacher breathed to himself. "He's gonna run for Congress."

 

How the Deep State created Russiagate.

from an article by Lee Smith.

For those like Gessen, Cohen, Lears, and others on the left who don’t understand how and when American journalists got in bed with the country’s spies, it started several years before Trump or Russiagate. It was while reporting on the Obama administration that the press came to rely on the White House’s political operatives, including intelligence officials, for sources and stories about American foreign policy. It got worse when the Obama administration started spying on its domestic opponents during the Iran deal, when the Obama administration learned how far it could go in manipulating the foreign-intelligence surveillance apparatus for domestic political advantage. As Adam Entous, then of The Wall Street Journal, wrote in a December 2015 article ^[21], “the National Security Agency’s targeting of Israeli leaders and officials also swept up the contents of some of their private conversations with U.S. lawmakers and American-Jewish groups.”

 

Obama administration officials had leaked the story to Entous in order to shape its reception. After all, the real news was pretty bad—Obama had spied on Americans and the Americans he spied on, Congress and Jewish community leaders, knew it. But in Entous’ account, it was only by accident that the National Security Agency had listened in on Americans opposed to the Iran deal, opponents whose communications had simply been “swept up.” While Entous’ evident lack of skepticism about that account was hardly good reporting, it was perfectly in keeping with the maxim of not biting the hand that feeds you.

 

What the White House really wanted to know, on Entous’ telling, was what the Israeli prime minister and his ambassador to Washington were doing to contest the Iran deal. Except, neither Benjamin Netanyahu nor Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer makes U.S. policy: Congress does. As I explained in an April Tablet article ^[22], the purpose of the spying campaign was to help the White House fight U.S. legislators and other Americans critical of the deal—i.e., to win a domestic political battle. A pro-Israel political operative who was deeply involved in the Iran deal fight told me last year, “The NSA’s collections of foreigners became a means of gathering real-time intelligence on Americans.” With the Iran deal, as would later happen with Russiagate, the ostensible targets of intelligence collection—Israel, then Russia—were simply instruments that the Obama administration used to go after the real bad guys, namely its enemies at home.

 

The same process of weaponizing foreign-intelligence collection for domestic political purposes that the Obama administration road-tested during the Iran-deal fight was used to manufacture Russiagate and get it to market. Except instead of keeping a close hold of the identities of those swept up during “incidental collection” of U.S. persons, departing Obama White House officials leaked the names to friendly reporters.

 

Leaking classified intelligence is a felony, which means that Obama officials, many in the intelligence community, who leaked the names of Americans whose communications were intercepted to the press, were breaking the law. A crucial concern, then, was the trustworthiness of the intermediaries chosen to publish classified intelligence. It is to those intermediaries that anyone seeking to understand how the press became an instrument of the U.S. intelligence bureaucracy’s information war must now turn.

 

Entous, now The New Yorker’s man in Washington, had already proved his trustworthiness by shaping the story about Obama administration spying on congressional and American Jewish-community leaders in a way that was favorable to the administration, and disguised blatant abuses of power. More stories would now come his way, courtesy of the U.S. intelligence community.

One of Entous’ most famous Russia-related scoops was a Dec. 31, 2016, Washington Post article ^[23] reporting that “according to US officials,” Russians hackers had penetrated the computer system of a Vermont dam. As it turns out, the story was entirely wrong.

 

A statement from Burlington Electric released ^[24] shortly after the Post’s story explained that a laptop unconnected to the company’s grid was affected by malware. There was no threat to the dam, never mind “the nation’s electrical grid,” as the anonymous U.S. officials quoted in the Entous story had claimed.

 

In other words, there was no story—which Entous or his co-writer would have discovered had they contacted the electricity company. They didn’t, because the story was not sourced to original reporting—i.e. discovering from sources on location in Vermont that the state’s electrical grid had in fact been compromised. In support of reporting like that, the journalists might well have sought supporting information or quotes from government officials, named or even anonymous. Instead, their story started with anonymous U.S. officials, who leaked to Entous and his colleague for the evident purpose of advancing the Russiagate narrative. Russia was everywhere—from a dam in Vermont to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

 

If Entous’ story about the Obama administration’s spying on Congress and U.S. Jewish leaders showed that the reporter was trustworthy, the Vermont-dam article showed he wasn’t going to ask many questions of the officials who pointed him toward a nonexistent story, whose purpose appeared to have less to do with the health of the state of Vermont than with fear-mongering about Russia.

Clearly, someone noticed. In the March 1, 2017, Washington Post, Entous was lead byline on an article ^[25] breaking the news that Attorney General Jeff Sessions met twice with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. A July 21, 2017, Post story ^[26] on which Entous had the lead byline alleged that Sessions had discussed campaign-related matters with Kislyak. The latter story provides evidence of how the March and July articles were produced—U.S. officials leaked classified intelligence regarding intercepts of Kislyak’s communications with Moscow, in which he discussed Sessions. Officials then unmasked the identity of the attorney general and leaked it to Entous and the other reporters on the story.

 

Following close on the heels of those two pass-through DC-based “scoops,” Entous was lead byline on an April 3, 2017, story ^[27] reporting a meeting in the Seychelles between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian banker, reportedly to set up a back channel between Trump and Putin. After publication of the story, Prince said ^[28] he was shown “specific evidence” by sources from the intelligence community that his name was unmasked and given to the paper. “Unless The Washington Post has somehow miraculously recruited the bartender of a hotel in the Seychelles,” Prince told ^[29] the House Intelligence Committee in December, “the only way that’s happening is through SIGINT [signals intelligence].” Recent news reports suggest that Prince’s meeting has become a key focus of the Mueller investigation. If those reports are accurate, it seems even more likely that classified intelligence was purposefully being leaked to put pressure on Prince. A week later, on April 11, 2017, Entous is bylined on yet another story based on a leak of classified intelligence that once again violated the privacy rights of an American citizen when the Post broke the news ^[30] that the FBI secured a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant on Carter Page.

 

If you think Russiagate is real, then you will probably conclude that Sessions, Prince, and Page are all part of a single, monstrous criminal conspiracy—and that Adam Entous is one of the most important journalists in American history, an indefatigable shoe-leather reporter who helped whistleblowers inside the federal government put the truth before the American public, like Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and Neil Sheehan combined. If you think the collusion story is nonsense, then Entous is just a political operative with a convenient byline. And if you think Russiagate is a campaign of political warfare waged in the shadows by bureaucrats who violated the privacy of American citizens in order to undo election results they disagreed with, then Entous is something worse—an asset whom sectors of the intelligence community have come to rely on in order to manipulate the public.

***

Mueller dusts off laws of French Revolution.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/12/robert-mueller-invokes-conspiracy-defraud-governme/

Robert Mueller, the DOJ's point man in trying to overthrow the Trump Presidency, has again changed tactics. At first, he pretended to investigate collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia. He knew full well that no such collusion had existed, so he changed tactics again. He now accuses part of the Trump campaign of a conspiracy to defraud the government.

The crime of "defrauding" is left undefined and it is what Mueller says it is. Thus Mueller recapitulates the law used during the French Revolution the so-called Law of the Suspect. It was made illegal to be a suspect! No proof of a crime was needed, just a declaration that someone was a suspect. Mueller's goal is to frighten Trump supporters by vague charges and then forcing the defendants into bankruptcy. One of the early victims of this modern Robespierre had to sell his house to pay for his legal bills.

Hopefully, the Republicans can maintain their majority in the House and increase their majority in the Senate, so Mueller can be fired and prosecuted.

gun control solution: prohibit Democrats from owning guns.

 

 

this appears to be an excellent solution on issue of gun control
 

A Possible Solution to Domestic Gun Violence In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States . In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States - who later died from the wound. In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States . In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States . In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States . In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant. In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office. In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office. In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX . In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory. In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service. In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the U.S. In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant. In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech. In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others. In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people. In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis. In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT. In Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 At a Navy ship yard.   On June 2017, an angry Democrat shot  Republican Steve Scalise On October 1, 2017 the Los Vegas gunman killed 59 concert goers.   Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns. Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings. SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. We don't need gun control, we need Democrat control. Guns don't kill people, Democrats do!

 

 

Virus-free. www.avast.com