Thursday, March 30, 2017

Evelyn Farkas admits Obama regime spied on Trump and team.

Evelyn Farkas was a minor player in the Obama regime. She admitted on MSNBC that the Trump team was being surveilled and that the collected stuff was being passed to the Hill [meaning Democrats on the Hill]. She was concerned that the unmasked info was not getting around fast enough. Trump was right.

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2017/03/30/obama-aide-admits-surveillance-of-trump/

Actually, "Farkas" is a Hungarian name and refers to an animal with a bushy tail. In particular, using it alone, "Farkas" means wolf. A farkas kutya (a dog with a bushy tail) is a German shepherd.

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

The "Algos" are running, the algos are running.

Today is option expiry on the CRIMEX, Thursday is option expiry on the OTC, so the patsies of the FED are running dumps of sales contracts for gold. Trading of these paper slips is done by algorhytms or 'algos' for short.


It is an unsettled time for shure. The demand for gold is rising,and  so are  efforts to 'cap' the gold price intensify. The ratio of paper gold to real gold is rising again. It is now reaching 500.


How long will it continue? Untill China and India call a halt to trading paper gold contracts and the charade of paper gold is called off. Is that time near? Hard to tell. For every two experts that write of the end of the CRIMEX, there is one that predicts gold falling to $950. The FED can print the money to keep gold prices down.

Funny thing happened on the way to repeal Obamacare.

Democrats were ecstatic. The Drive by Media were orgazing about "explaining the cause" of the failure:


1. It was due to Trump's inexperience;
2. It was due to Trump's abraisiveness (that was even shared by a friend);
3. The GOP can not govern;
4; It was due to the Speaker booby-trapping the bill to repeal;
5. It was due to Conservatives sabotaging the whole thing.


Healthcare is a complex subject. It took over 2,000 pages of the original Obamacare bill to describe how healthcare would be mismanaged. Obamacare is failing, because it was meant to fail. Obama himself said he preferred the "Single Payer" which is a code word for government-run medicine. So, Democrats want to replace Obamacare with the Single Payer and nothing else.


So, why did the 'Repeal/replace' bill fail? Because id did not repeal. For the Dems it is a victory. Even if the bill cleared the House, it would have rough sailing in the Senate. Why? Because even though Republicans need only 51 votes in the Senate, they may not have 51 votes. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, John McCain and Graham of S Carolina can not be relied on when the Media puts on a full court press.


So, what will happen now? The Dems have been encouraged. They will filibuster the Gorsuch nomination, they will try to stop the tax cut and they will continue to drum the fake news of the "Russian Connection." Oh, and they will try to continue the import of 'people of color' who will vote for them. 

Sunday, March 26, 2017

Who blew the whistle and what was told Comey?

House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes told Trump yesterday that he obtained documents PROVING the FBI spied on Trump and his staff. Now we just found out the probable source of these leaked documents!
Former DOJ prosecutor Larry Klayman sent a letter telling Nunes that a CIA whistleblower had contacted him with 47 hard drives and 600 million images that PROVE Obama and Comey spied on Trump and many others! (See The Letter Below)
Klayman went on Live TV last night to drop this bombshell and explain how James Comey is engaged in a MASSIVE COVER-UP! Watch and then SHAREon Facebook because the mainstream media won’t cover it!
Here is the letter Klayman sent to Chairman Nunes and the rest of the intelligence Committee. THIS IS HUGE!

Well, Comey is finished. Larry Klayman has divulged some exceuciating information. Comey, Obama, and the rest of those

Friday, March 24, 2017

Fake lasagna (with ravioli)

This is a dish to make when you have just a few minutes to start it, almost an hour to wait and you like cheese.

Ingredients
1 package of 25 to 27 piece beef-filled frozen ravioli
24 oz jar of pasta sauce
2-3 cups shredded mozzarella
1/2 to 1 cup o shredded Parmesan cheese

Nothing tricky. The pasta sauce makes a big difference.

Method

Preheat oven to 400F.
Lightly grease 8x8 in casserole dish
Pour in about 1 cup pasta sauce.
Add layer of ravioli
Top with more pasta sauce
Add mozzarella cheese
Then the rest of ravioli
Cover with rest of mozzarella then the Parmesan cheese

Cover with foil and bake 45 minutes.
Take off foil and bake another 10 minutes
Take out of oven and let cool for 10 minutes.

Store leftovers under foil and reheat.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

An English woman (Katie Hopkins) despairs in London

This place is just like Sweden. Terrified of admitting the truth about the threat we face, about the horrors committed by the migrants we failed to deter — because to admit that we are sinking, and fast, would be to admit that everything the liberals believe is wrong.
That multiculturalism has not worked. That it is one big fat failure and one big fat lie.
President Erdogan of Turkey said there is a war being waged between the crescent and the cross. But he is wrong. Because the cross is not strong. We are down on bended knee, a doormat to be trodden on, a joke only funny to those that wish us harm.
The war is between London and the rest of the country. Between the liberals and the right-minded. Between those who think it is more important to tip-toe around the cultures of those who choose to join us, rather than defend our own culture.
Katie Hopkins says these incidents are no longer unusual, but commonplace
Katie Hopkins says these incidents are no longer unusual, but commonplace
How many more times?
And how many more attacks must pass before we acknowledge these are no longer the acts of ‘extremists’? That there is no safe badge with which to hold these people at arm’s length, in the way the liberals casually use the term 'far-right' for anyone who has National pride.
These events are no longer extreme. They are commonplace. Every day occurrences.
These people are no longer extremists. They are simply more devout. More true to their beliefs. Beliefs which will be supported endlessly across our state broadcaster for the next few months until we buy into the narrative that one religion is not to blame.
That in fact we should blame Brexit supporters. For believing in a Britain. As it was before.
Anything but the truth.
This is why there is no anger from me this time, no rage. No nod for those who pretend we will not be cowed, even as they rush home to text their mum they are safe. No surprise that the city of which I was so proud is now punctured by fear, and demarcated even more formally by places we cannot tread; there were always parts in which a white woman could not safely walk.
Sadiq Khan should 'stop talking' according to Katie Hopkins, who says his words are empty as we are 'wrenched asunder' 
Sadiq Khan should 'stop talking' according to Katie Hopkins, who says his words are empty as we are 'wrenched asunder' 
Now I feel only sadness, overwhelming sadness.
I will walk over the river tonight and look to the Thames, to the Union flag lowered at half mast, and the Parliament below, and I will wonder, just how much longer we can go on like this. 

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Obama: the trap is closing.

We have had stories by the NYT that Obama suspected collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russia. So, he ordered surveillance of Trump and advisors. The results of the surveillance (called wiretaps in the old parlance) were disseminated widely in order to stop the incoming Administration from making them disappear. That is, of course, illegal.

The 'drive-by-media' called Trump a liar and even produced a phoney poll that this reduced him in the opinion polls. But, Trump had the goods on them all along.

Now, the news comes out that YES the Trumps team was surveilled (i.e. wire tapped in the old parlance) and that the names of those surveilled were unmasked. This is a felony.

Democrats (on and off FOX) claim that the Trump people accidentally got caught up in the surveillance of Russian activity.

There are two problems with that. The info turned over to Nunez shows that the FISA warrant authorizing the surveillance was NOT about Russian activities. Furthermore, the Russians could be surveilled without a warrant. A FISA warrant is needed only for the surveillance of Americans. So, Obama most likely looked for an excuse to wiretap Trump and his team and told  the Agencies involved to deny everything. Except a whistleblower sent some documents to Nunez.

Democrats are up in arms that Nunez did not show them the documents. That means that the documents show the name of the Whistleblower, which the Dems want to know desperately so they can make the Whistleblower the issue instead of the content of the documents. The FBI has refused to send Congress requested mateials.

Nunes: Trump team surveilled, data disseminated.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-03-22/nunes-says-trump-team-communications-caught-in-u-s-surveillance

Trump haters caught in the wrong once again. Now it is on to trying toi smear Manafort. Trump haters just won't give up.

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Is Trump's wiretap claim irrational?

Mr Greenwald has taken a step toward sanity (even though he gratuitously insults right wingers), so let us do the same. Is there or is there not evidence that the Trump campaign was surveilled?

The answer is YES. There are two FISA Court applications to do just that. THIS IS FACT. It is also a fact that Trump's advisors were listened to and their conversations illegally disclosed.

Greenwald's article on Democrat insanity.

Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images
From MSNBC politics shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.
The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.
Key Democratic officials are clearly worried about the expectations that have been purposely stoked and are now trying to tamp them down. Many of them have tried to signal that the beliefs the base has been led to adopt have no basis in reason or evidence.
The latest official to throw cold water on the MSNBC-led circus is President Obama’s former acting CIA chief Michael Morell. What makes him particularly notable in this context is that Morell was one of Clinton’s most vocal CIA surrogates. In August, he not only endorsed Clinton in the pages of the New York Times but also became the first high official to explicitly accuse Trump of disloyalty, claiming, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”
But on Wednesday night, Morell appeared at an intelligence community forum to “cast doubt” on “allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.” “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire at all,” he said, adding, “There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”
Obama’s former CIA chief also cast serious doubt on the credibility of the infamous, explosive “dossier” originally published by BuzzFeed, saying that its author, Christopher Steele, paid intermediaries to talk to the sources for it. The dossier, he said, “doesn’t take you anywhere, I don’t think.”
Morell’s comments echo the categorical remarks by Obama’s top national security official, James Clapper, who told Meet the Press last week that during the time he was Obama’s DNI, he saw no evidence to support claims of a Trump/Russia conspiracy. “We had no evidence of such collusion,” Clapper stated unequivocally. Unlike Morell, who left his official CIA position in 2013 but remains very integrated into the intelligence community, Clapper was Obama’s DNI until just seven weeks ago, leaving on January 20.
Perhaps most revealing of all are the Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee — charged with investigating these matters — who recently told BuzzFeed how petrified they are of what the Democratic base will do if they do not find evidence of collusion, as they now suspect will likely be the case. “There’s a tangible frustration over what one official called ‘wildly inflated’ expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation,” BuzzFeed’s Ali Watkins wrote.
Moreover, “several committee sources grudgingly say, it feels as though the investigation will be seen as a sham if the Senate doesn’t find a silver bullet connecting Trump and Russian intelligence operatives.” One member told Watkins: “I don’t think the conclusions are going to meet people’s expectations.”
What makes all of this most significant is that officials like Clapper and Morell are trained disinformation agents; Clapper in particular has proven he will lie to advance his interests. Yet even with all the incentive to do so, they are refusing to claim there is evidence of such collusion; in fact, they are expressly urging people to stop thinking it exists. As even the law recognizes, statements that otherwise lack credibility become more believable when they are ones made “against interest.”
Media figures have similarly begun trying to tamp down expectations. Ben Smith, the editor-in-chief of BuzzFeed, which published the Steele dossier, published an article yesterday warning that the Democratic base’s expectation of a smoking gun “is so strong that Twitter and cable news are full of the theories of what my colleague Charlie Warzel calls the Blue Detectives — the left’s new version of Glenn Beck, digital blackboards full of lines and arrows.” Smith added: “It is also a simple fact that while news of Russian actions on Trump’s behalf is clear, hard details of coordination between his aides and Putin’s haven’t emerged.” And Smith’s core warning is this:
Trump’s critics last year were horrified at the rise of “fake news” and the specter of a politics shaped by alternative facts, predominantly on the right. They need to be careful now not to succumb to the same delusional temptations as their political adversaries, and not to sink into a filter bubble which, after all, draws its strength not from conservative or progressive politics but from human nature.
And those of us covering the story and the stew of real information, fantasy, and — now — forgery around it need to continue to report and think clearly about what we know and what we don’t, and to resist the sugar high that comes with telling people exactly what they want to hear.
For so long, Democrats demonized and smeared anyone trying to inject basic reason, rationality, and skepticism into this Trump/Russia discourse by labeling them all Kremlin agents and Putin lovers. Just this week, the Center for American Progress released a report using the language of treason to announce the existence of a “Fifth Column” in the U.S. that serves Russia (similar to Andrew Sullivan’s notorious 2001 decree that anyone opposing the war on terror composed an anti-American “Fifth Column”), while John McCain listened to Rand Paul express doubts about the wisdom of NATO further expanding to include Montenegro and then promptly announced: “Paul is working for Vladimir Putin.”
But with serious doubts — and fears — now emerging about what the Democratic base has been led to believe by self-interested carnival barkers and partisan hacks, there is a sudden, concerted effort to rein in the excesses of this story. With so many people now doing this, it will be increasingly difficult to smear them all as traitors and Russian loyalists, but it may be far too little, too late, given the pitched hysteria that has been deliberately cultivated around these issues for months. Many Democrats have reached the classic stage of deranged conspiracists where evidence that disproves the theory is viewed as further proof of its existence, and those pointing to it are instantly deemed suspect.
A formal, credible investigation into all these questions, where the evidence is publicly disclosed, is still urgently needed. That’s true primarily so that conspiracies no longer linger and these questions are resolved by facts rather than agenda-driven anonymous leaks from the CIA and cable news hosts required to feed a partisan mob.
It’s certainly possible to envision an indictment of a low-level operative like Carter Page, or the prosecution of someone like Paul Manafort on matters unrelated to hacking, but the silver bullet that Democrats have been led to expect will sink Trump appears further away than ever.
But given the way these Russia conspiracies have drowned out other critical issues being virtually ignored under the Trump presidency, it’s vital that everything be done now to make clear what is based in evidence and what is based in partisan delusions. And most of what the Democratic base has been fed for the last six months by their unhinged stable of media, online, and party leaders has decisively fallen into the latter category, as even their own officials are now desperately trying to warn.

How to weigh the two "NO"s.

The two NOs in question are Comey's response to two questions:


1. is there any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian agents about the 2016 election and


2. is there any evidence that the Obama regime had Trump under surveillance?


As you know, Comey answered both questions with a "NO." So, how credible are Comey's answers?


Remember that these people are Obama's appointees. If the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians, there would be evidence. Such an evidence can not be faked without detecting that the evidence was faked. That would mean potential jail time for Comey. So, the first "NO" is credible.


How about the second "NO?" There were all sorts of reports in the Press that Trump and his people were under surveillance. Admitting that would put some people in jail. So, the surveillance is denied by Comey. President Trump insists.


The second "NO" is not credible.

Monday, March 20, 2017

Comey: SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL.

FBI Director Comey has testified that the FBI found no evidence of Russian hacking of the Presidential vote or wiretaps put on Trump Tower in NYC. Inasmuch as physical evidence of a wiretap can be removed in minutes, it is not surprising. However, phones can be tapped without physical tools and so far there is no evidence presented on that. Yet, journalism sources claimed that Trump associates were investigated on the basis of wiretap evidence (see previous post).

Far more objectionable is the remark by Rep Nunes of CA that we can not know if the alleged Russian interference might have made the difference in the final vote.

Considering that the CIA has computer programs that can mimic intrusion by foreign powers, the outcome of these investigations (along with attributing the hack of Podesta emails) suggesting that the hack was done by Russia is highly questionable.

The recount of votes in Michigan produced evidence of manufactured Democrat votes in Michigan. I would bet that even more shady practice took place in Philadelphia.Nobody said a word of that so far.

Trump family and associated WERE surveilled.

NSA Documents Prove Surveillance of Donald Trump & His Family

Bombshell discovery shows targets of NSA's "Project Dragnet"

0
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Infowars.com have obtained credible information from law enforcement sources regarding individual records of U.S. citizens under National Security Agency (NSA) electronic surveillance in the years 2004 through 2010 – a database that suggests both Donald J. Trump and Alex Jones were under illegal, unauthorized government monitoring during those years.
LIVE COVERAGE OF NSA SPYING ON TRUMP
Michael Zullo, formerly the commander and chief investigator of the Cold Case Posse (CCP), a special investigative group created in 2006 in the office of Joseph M. Arpaio, formerly the sheriff in Maricopa County, an Arizona State Certified Law Enforcement Agency, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, provided sections of the database to Infowars.com.
The electronic surveillance database, provided to Zullo by a whistleblower in 2013, was apparently created by the NSA as part of the NSA’s illegal and unconstitutional Project Dragnet electronic surveillance of U.S. citizens, first revealed by news reports published in 2005, as further documented by the revelations of whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo have identified dozens of entries at various addresses, including both Trump Tower in New York City and Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, under which Donald Trump was apparently under NSA electronic surveillance from 2004, during President George W. Bush’s term of office, through 2009, the first year of President Obama’s presidency.
Electronic surveillance of Donald Trump was listed in the database for the following companies, locations, and dates:
Trump International
1 Central Park, NYC, NY
2008
Trump World Tower
845 United Nations Plaza, NYC, NY
No Date
Trump Tower SAL
108 Central Park, NYC, NY
2007
Trump Palace Co
200 E. 69th Street A, NYC, NY
2008
Trump Entertainment
725 Fifth Ave. FL, NYC, NY
2007
Trump Organization
725 Fifth Ave. BSM, NYC, NY
2009
Trump Palace
725 Fifth Ave., NYC, NY
2004
Mar-a-Lago Club
1100 S. Ocean BL, Palm Beach, FL
2006
Trump International
401 N. Wabash Ave., Chicago, IL
2008
Douglass Limousine
239 Nassau St., Princeton, NJ
2008
Trump International
3505 Summit BLV, West Palm Beach, FL
2004
Flights INC
P.O. Box 196, Hamilton MA
2004
Trump International
1 Central Park, NYC, NY
2008
Trump Hotels
Huron Ave., Atlantic City, NJ
No Date
Trump National
339 Pine Rd, Briarcliff, NY
No Date
Trump Plaza & C
2500 Pacific Ave, Atlantic City, NJ
2008
Trump Palace Co.
200 E. 69th St., NYC, NY
2008
Seven Springs
66 Oregon Rd, Mount Kisco, NY
2006-2008
While attempts have been made to deny such domestic surveillance, reports from the New York Times in 2014 showed the Central Intelligence Agency had done just that by spying on a senate panel investigating the agency’s use of “enhanced interrogation.”
 
In a 2016 article from The Guardian entitled, “‘A constitutional crisis’: the CIA turns on the Senate,” it is likewise noted just how drastic and widespread the CIA’s domestic surveillance operation was.
As revealed from the Dragnet database, not only was Trump himself surveilled but so were numerous employees of his located at Trump Tower.
Former CIA officer Larry Johnson recently joined the Alex Jones show to discuss how intelligence sources have stated that such surveillance of Trump during the presidential election in fact took place.
Here is a partial list of the Trump employees that show up in the Project Dragnet database:
• Patricia Hernandez, a Manager for the Trump Organization, was under NSA electronic surveillance at Trump Parc, Central Park South, in New York City, at phone 212-586-xxxx, date: 9/16/2008.
• Mike van der Goes, a Golf Pro at Oceans Trails Golf Course in Palos Verdes, who was promoted to be general manager when Trump bought the course from the bank in 2005 and renamed it Trump National. Mike van der Goes was under surveillance at Trump National, 1 Ocean TRL, Rancho Palos Verdes, California, at phone: 310-265-xxxx, no date.
• Carolyn Kepcher, a frequent guest on NBC’s television program “The Apprentice,” who was under NSA electronic surveillance when she was General Manager at the Trump National Golf Course in Briarcliff, New York, in Westchester County north of New York City, at 339 Pine Rd., in Briarcliff, New York, at phone 914-944-xxxx, date: 9/7/206.
• Joe Traci, a Real Estate Property Manager at Trump New World Property Management, at 438 W. 69th Street, New York City, phone 212-769-xxxx, date: 11/12/2008; and at 5 12th Street, New York City, phone: 212-586-xxxx, no date.
• Roger Socio, a Senior Project Manager, Trump Organization, Trump Tower, 725 Fifth Avenue, New York City, phone: 212-715-xxxx, 2/23/2009.
• Bill Fichter, Residents Manager, Trump Organization, Trump Palace, 200 E. 69th Street, New York City, phone: 212-879-xxxx, date: 2/24/2009.
• Florin Bogosel, Trump Park Avenue, 502 Park Avenue, New York City, phone: 212-223-xxxx, no date.
• Grace Dunne, Trump Park Residence, 3770 Barger Street, Shrub Oak, New York, phone: 914-245-xxxx, date 1/26/2006.
• Greg Bradley, Vice President, Trump Pavilion for Nursing and Rehabilitation, 9028 Van Wyck, East Richmond Hill, New York, phone: 718-291-xxxx, no date.
All these employees appear to have been under NSA phone surveillance, plus various of them under financial surveillance as well.
The Project Dragnet database suggests Trump was under surveillance not only for phone conversations, but also for financial information, including most likely bank account transactions, credit card transactions, and tax filings.
Both federal and state law enforcement have had access to the Project Dragnet database, allowing widespread use for methods such as parallel construction. The practice, outlined in the 2013 Reuters article, “U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans,” reveals the breadth of information that trickles down to law enforcement from high-level intelligence agencies.
Also listed as under NSA surveillance in the period 2004-2010 was Trump’s former wife, Ivanka Trump at House of Ivanka, 10 East 64th Street, New York City.
The Project Dragnet database also indicates that the NSA was conducting electronic surveillance on an extensive list of Trump employees in the years 2004-2010 – the only years for which Sheriff Arpaio had data.
Alex Jones is listed as being under electronic surveillance for phone records, as well as under surveillance for financial records, in 2006. The address listed for Alex Jones in the NSA Project Dragnet database was correct for his residence at that time. So too, Alex Jones confirmed the phone number listed was also correct.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo have validated through law enforcement channels the validity of the name, address, and telephone numbers for the dates that appear in the Project Dragnet database.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo are prepared to share relevant information with appropriate federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, as well as the Department of Justice, Homeland Security Department, the White House, and members of Congress the Project Dragnet Database in whole, or in part, as it pertains to NSA electronic surveillance of Donald J. Trump and his various employee.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo also show up in the database, listed as being under both phone and financial surveillance.
Zullo explained that he and Arpaio came in contact with the information from Operation Dragnet during an unrelated investigation that began in October 2013 and ended January 2015.
A whistleblower by the name of Dennis Montgomery brought forward information that Montgomery alleges was collected while he was employed as a subcontractor for the NSA, working on various surveillance projects.
Court documents do verify Montgomery was contracted by the NSA, in part to develop computer breaching software that has been utilized in government mass surveillance operations targeting American citizens without legal justification.
While Montgomery’s credibility has been called into question, Zullo maintains that the amount of information provided by Montgomery related to Operation Dragnet was extraordinarily voluminous and that Montgomery had shared information with investigators in 2013 that is only now being revealed by media outlets.

0

Related Articles


Saturday, March 18, 2017

How crazy are Liberals?

I hesitate to include this post because it may be a prank. Nobody can be this stupid. However, these are anti-Trump crazies, so anything is possible.



As reported previously, 2 students at The University of California stated that they would publicly remove their penis’ if Trump enforced the existing USA-Mexico border wall. In a continuance of this trend, 4 students at the University of Washington have promised to remove pieces of their reproductive anatomy if Trump builds the wall.
Washington Sophomore Trent Griliphaen said he was inspired by the movement at The University of California, and that he “thinks that Trump’s construction of the wall is just an extension of his penis, and an expression of Patriarchal rape culture. Really, by building the wall, we are raping the Mexican people, and I am no longer willing to be a perpetrator of rape culture. If I remove my penis, I am making a statement that I reject this mentality.”
Griliphaen was apparently the first student at UW to embrace this movement, and according to him, he has inspired three other male students to emasculate themselves, in public, when construction of the new border wall commences.
I heard about what was happening in California, and new that this kind of movement could gain traction up here – we are a progressive state. I kind of feel guilty, I’m removing my penis, but one of the other guys is going to castrate himself, and he’s even considering taking off a couple of fingers” stated Griliphaen.
 

Gold/silver divergence.

There  is an interesting divergence between the gold market and the silver market. IMHO, the FED and its allied banks are using the silver market to keep the price of gold down. How? This is how. You can see the money pouring into the gold and silver markets and in the morning silver miners go up. T%hen, inexplicably, silver miners drop, followed shortly by a drop in silver prices. Gold prices are going nowhere in the meantime.
 
So, how is this done?
 
To find the answer, we need to look at the short position of the Commercials. These are banks that are in the know. Here is the short position of the Commercials:
 
 
Contrast this to the position of the Commercials in gold:
 
 
The divergence allows the Commercial shorts to cover some of their positions in gold. How long will this continue? Untill some banks gang together and precipitate a short squeeze in silver. Then silver be the leading precious metal again. A bank like the FED can lose a lot of money this way. The Swiss National Bank had devastating losses while trying to manipulate currency losses. Someone should audit the FED.
 

Friday, March 17, 2017

An Irish story.

A Texan walked into an Irish Pub and loudly announces that he will give $500 to any man who can drink 10 pints of Guinness back to back. The announcement is followed by stony silence. One customer even leaves. Twenty minutes pass and the same customer who just left returns. Is the offer still open, he asks the Texan. Aye, says the Texan. So, they set up the ten pints and the Irish man sets to it with gusto and drinks all of them down. The Texan shakes his head but peels off 5 $100 bills from a fat roll and the patrons cheer. The Texan then asks the Irishman (to satisfy his curiosity)... say when you left a few minutes ago where did you go? Aye, says the Irishman, I ran over to the next pub to see if I could do ten pints.
 
And here is an interesting roundup:
 

Peggy Noonan: Reach across the aisle Mr President.

That is the title of Peggy Noonan's incomprehensible anti-Trump diatribe.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/reach-across-the-aisle-mr-president-1489705420?

Ms Noonan is wrong on at least two counts:

1. First, the Democrats are not interested in reaching across the aisle. They simply want to drive President Trump from office. They make this clear every day, whether one listens to the incoherent Nancy Pelosi or to Chuck Schumer.

2. Obamacare was passed as part of Reconciliation, so its reform can be passed likewise: without Democrat votes.

There is a deep-seated reason why repeal/replace of Obamacare should be done without Democrat input. Obamacare was designed to fail, to be replaced by government run medicine as in Canada and Europe. So, a compromise with Democrats would involve the establishment of socialized medicine. And the essence of socialized medicine is government coercion, absence of control by the patient and rationing of care. Americans expressed their objection to Obamacare by decimating the Democrats who were for it in 2912, 2014 and 2016.

Yes, Miz Noonan, it is a complex subject and hard to do. But it should be done and not surrendered to the Socialists.

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Sharyl Attkisson blows the whistle on wiretapping and such.

Sheryl Attkisson works for CBS. There was a US govt authorized bug on her computer. The Justice Dept is blocking efforts to find out the identity of who placed the reporting program. Attkisson had appeared on FOX and told us that it is well possible that Donald Trump was monitored during the election. President Trump himself seem to know this. The NYT and a couple of other Liberal outlets claimed that they had evidence based on wiretap evidence of Trump.

Attkisson also told us that Obama probably would not order a wiretap, but that his subordinates could. Or, Obama could issue a directive to do surveillance and lie about it.

The plot thickens.

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

What is wrong with Ryancare?

Basically, the bill groups all the changes that will hurt into the first two years, while the good things will not click in for five. Is Speaker Ryan doing this to scuttle the repeal? Or, is he following his promise that he will not help Trump?

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Gaging US ability to survive.

We have some powerful enemies all right: China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran and most every Islamic country. But, the strongest enemies are found in the United States.

You are skeptical? Well, consider where we are. And let me remind you that the direction of what has happened to the US was done deliberately.

We have a sizable part of the elites who are Marxists. And they are working feverishly to convert us into a Marxist dictatorship. You think it is laughable with a Constitution like ours? But, the movement toward a Marxist dictatorship is not to happen by votes - Americans will NEVER vote for that -  but by an economic collapse.

In the 1960s two Marxist sociologist by the name of Cloward and Piven developed the strategy that our Marxist Party follows. The strategy calls for the bankrupting of the system by driving the Welfare System to bankruptcy. As the system collapses, the Marxists will take over and establish a dictatorship.

So, how close are we to their goal?

We have run up a National Debt that is equal to 75% of our annual production of goods. That is the National Debt that is admitted. The other part of the debt, the unfunded liability is another $100T! However, another important figure is the amount of money it takes to keep the debt growing larger. That is  calculated as $300B/year. IMHO, that is too low and will double and triple as the FED raises interest rates.

During the Presidency of Barak Hussein, we have added $10T to the National Debt and driven government spending sky high. But, Barak Hussein did more than increase spending. He imported many thousands of Central Americans to settle in the US as undocumented. These are future Democrats (members of the Marxist Party) who will drive the Welfare State bankrupt. So, people elected Donald Trump as President because he pledged to  thwart the efforts of the Marxists. That is why we are drifting closer to a Civil War. The Marxists do not want to give up their gains.

Monday, March 13, 2017

Meat loaf: the ultimate comfort food.

Meat loaf and mashed potatoes are one of the favorites of my family. This recipe can feed six people with three of them big eaters.

Ingredients
the "filler"
1 1/2 cup milk
1 1/2 cup regular oat meal
1 1/4 cup parmaghiana cheese
1 1/2 tsp seasoned salt
1/2 tsp black pepper (ground)
1/2 cup flat-leaf parsley leaves
4 eggs beaten

the meat
3 lb ground beef (80/20)

the bacon cover
10 slices thinly sliced bacon

the sauce
1 cup tomato sauce
1/2 cup ketchup
1 1/2 tsp dry mustard
tobacco to taste

Method of mixing the loaf

1. Mix the filler except the eggs in a large glass bowl
2. lightly beat the eggs in another bowl then add to the rest of the filler
3. Add the meat and combine and mix with hand
4. Make sure all the filler is mixed with the meat. Form the loaves on a baking dish with holes.
5. Form the mass into a loaf and cover with the 10 slices of bacon. Alternatively, you can split the mass into two loaves and cover with slices of bacon.

Cover with 1/3of the sauce.
For the sauce mix 1 cup tomato sauce, 1/2 cup ketchup, 1/2 cup BBQ sauce and 1 1/2 tsp dry mustard

Baking.
Bake for 45 minutes at 350 F
Take out and add another 1/3of the sauce
Bake another 15 minutes

Check if done.
Remove the center slice of bacon and check the meat. If not done, bake another 15 minutes.

Serve with mashed potatoes.


Sunday, March 12, 2017

Dems lose appetite for screaming about Russia hacking election.

Apart from a few partisan Democrats, most in Congress are cooling about the claim that Russia hacked the election. The story peddled by the Media was that Trump's people were in regular contact with the Russians.As it turns out, the Russian Ambassador was trying to buttonhole any American in high places. It is his job. Now we leand that Ambassador Kysliyak had contacts with Hillary's people as well. Maybe that's why the Dems are losing their appetite for an investigation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/13/hillary-clintons-team-met-russian-ambassador-says-kremlin-spokesman/

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

What does Larry say now?

Just in case this is the first time you read about Larry, here is a short introduction.
 
Larry Edelson is a financial analyst who studies economic and political cycles and makes predictions from his studies. Such studies were initiated by Pres Herbert Hoover and his advisor Edward R Dewey in 1932. They discovered that economic events run in cycles with formulas such as y=sin (x). The cycles have names such as: the Kitchin cycle, the Juglar cycle, the Kondratieff wave and so on.
 
Larry's finding: He reported that the cycles gave a minimum in 2015, signaling the start of some very hard times. Larry referred to the time frame of 2016-2020 as "a roller coaster ride through Hell."
 
he sequence of events would unroll as follows:
1. First, the EU would self-destruct sending a tidal wave of capital to the US. DOW to 25,000;
2. Japan would tank.
3. The US would tank.
 
All hell would break loose and conditions abnormal until 2020.
 
Larry's current forecast
 
EU to start collapsing 2017.
Japan would collapse
DOW to go to 31,000.
US would collapse while gold and silver skyrocket.
 
Cycle not over until 2022.
 
Election of Trump makes no difference as he can not undo the debt.

China initiates economic sanctions against S Korea.

On the heel of N Korea firing missiles at Japan (as a practice to attack American bases), the US moved some THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) batteries to S Korea.

China retaliated by closing four LOTTE department stores, some K-POP programs and has scrapped tourist booking facilities.

S  Korea will appeal to the WTO.

Monday, March 6, 2017

Obama has a record of wiretapping friend and foe alike.

From Gateway Pundit:

This is now being referred to as Obamagate!
It is not unfounded that former President Obama would wire tap President Trump during the election process.  This is because he has done this before.  Here is a list of individuals who were wire tapped by the Obama Administration.
WikiLeaks released the following list on February 23rd (see link here) of Obama Administration wire taps:
* The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;
* Obama bugged Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;
* Obama singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;
* Obama stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;
* Obama intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);
* Obama explicitly targeted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;
* Obama explicitly targetted the phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception; and
* Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.
In addition to the above list we also know now that Obama wire tapped various individuals in the US media that were reporting information not flattering to the Obama Administration.  It is widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013:
* In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks.  The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.
* Also in 2013, members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance.  The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”
* Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration.  A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post.
Obama is no stranger to wire tapping.  His administration tapped phones and computers of friends and foe alike.
TGP image by Brett R. Smith

The timeline of Obamagate.

h/t 

So, what happened at Trump Tower?

This is what I get so far. Obama's henchmen went to the FISA Court in June to place a tap in Trump Tower. The request was denied. Then another request was launched in October or November. The reason? Somebody had an account with a Russian bank and to the Obama henchmen this was suspicious. So, the FISA Court granted the tap. It turned out that the whole thing was quite innocuous.

Questions:

1. Was the suspicion reasonable or just an excuse to tap the campaign?
2. Did this connection give the idea to the Obama henchmen to launch a campaign to delegitimize the Trump election?
3. Was Hillary told and how? (There was a tweet from her indicating she was told). That is a felony.
4. Did Obama know and when?

Charles Schumer invokes the "Law of the Suspect." This was used during the French Revolution. It made it illegal to be a suspect. Schumer claims that if there was a tap (and a probable cause) that this is especially bad for Trump.

Sunday, March 5, 2017

Pres Trump asks Congress to probe bugging of Trump campaign.

Washington (AFP) - President Donald Trump is asking Congress to probe "potentially politically motivated investigations" during the 2016 campaign, the White House said Sunday.
The announcement came one day after Trump took to Twitter to accuse his predecessor Barack Obama of tapping his phones ahead of the November election, without providing evidence of the explosive charge.
An Obama spokesman has denied Trump's accusation as "simply false."
In his statement, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer referred to unspecified reports of "potentially politically motivated investigations immediately ahead of the 2016 election" as "very troubling."
"President Donald J. Trump is requesting that as part of their investigation into Russian activity, the congressional intelligence committees exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch investigative powers were abused in 2016," Spicer said.
He added that there would be no more comment on the matter from Trump or the White House.
Trump leveled his charges against Obama early Saturday, at the end of a week in which his administration was battered by controversy over communications between Russian officials and some of his senior aides including Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
"I'd bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!" Trump wrote.
"How low has President Obama gone to tapp (sic) my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!" he wrote in another tweet, referring to the political scandal that toppled president Richard Nixon in 1974.
From Yahoo News.
 
AJ begins.

In a previous post, I have reported that the Obama regime did try to get a FISA warrant to bug the Trump campaign. The FISA Court at first denied the request. The request was then rephrased, resubmitted and permission was granted. THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN was bugged. Possibly Trump himself. To maintain deniability, the whole thing was orchestrated NOT at Obama's orders but by someone else in his DEEP STATE.

Here is a source stating this:

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

  1. Home
  2. World
By Louise Mensch | 10:18 pm, November 7, 2016
Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.
Contrary to earlier reporting in the New York Times, which cited FBI sources as saying that the agency did not believe that the private server in Donald Trump’s Trump Tower which was connected to a Russian bank had any nefarious purpose, the FBI’s counter-intelligence arm, sources say, re-drew an earlier FISA court request around possible financial and banking offenses related to the server. The first request, which, sources say, named Trump, was denied back in June, but the second was drawn more narrowly and was granted in October after evidence was presented of a server, possibly related to the Trump campaign, and its alleged links to two banks; SVB Bank and Russia’s Alfa Bank. While the Times story speaks of metadata, sources suggest that a FISA warrant was granted to look at the full content of emails and other related documents that may concern US persons.
The FBI agents who talked to the New York Times, and rubbished the ground-breaking stories of Slate ( Franklin Foer) and Mother Jones (David Corn) may not have known about the FISA warrant, sources say, because the counter-intelligence and criminal sides of the FBI often work independently of each other employing the principle of ‘compartmentalization’.
The FISA warrant was granted in connection with the investigation of suspected activity between the server and two banks, SVB Bank and Alfa Bank. However, it is thought in the intelligence community that the warrant covers any ‘US person’ connected to this investigation, and thus covers Donald Trump and at least three further men who have either formed part of his campaign or acted as his media surrogates. The warrant was sought, they say, because actionable intelligence on the matter provided by friendly foreign agencies could not properly be examined without a warrant by US intelligence as it involves ‘US Persons’ who come under the remit of the FBI and not the CIA. Should a counter-intelligence investigation lead to criminal prosecutions, sources say, the Justice Department is concerned that the chain of evidence have a basis in a clear  warrant.
In June, when the first FISA warrant was denied, the FBI was reportedly alarmed at Carter Page’s trip to Moscow and meetings with Russian officials, one week before the DNC was hacked. Counter intelligence agencies later reported to both Presidential candidates that Russia had carried out this hack; Donald Trump said publicly in the third debate that ‘our country has no idea’ if Russia did the hacking. The discovery of the Trump Tower private Russian server, however, communicating with Alfa Bank, changed matters, sources report.
To further complicate the story, the FISA warrant was allegedly granted in part because of the involvement of Vladimir Putin’s own daughters. One is married to a senior official at Gazprom, where Carter Page and Paul Manafort reportedly have holdings; another to Kirill Shamalov, a banking official.
The fact that the alleged warrant was a FISA warrant is itself significant. The court exists to grant warrants to examine cases concerned with Foreign Intelligence.
Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes.  Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.
Bradley P. Moss is a national security lawyer. He told us:
If a FISA warrant was issued, it does not necessarily mean that the court considered any U.S. persons as literal ‘spies.’ I can imagine an argument having been made that there was probable cause to believe they were “agents of influence” who were unwittingly being influenced by a foreign power.
If the operation concerns suspected money laundering involving a foreign government, the FISA warrant could theoretically encompass U.S. persons in that limited context. A FISA warrant is authorization to collect evidence, not to arrest.
On October 9th, the Trump campaign released a large number of documents pointing out what they alleged were Hillary Clinton’s ties to Russia.  On October 12th, rumors of a FISA warrant started to surface online.  Donald Trump’s campaign had not answered requests for comment on the matter at time of going to press.

Saturday, March 4, 2017

Scandals mount for Obama.

1. Bugging Trump Tower and Trump campaign.

President Trump has just learned that Obama and his henchmen had wiretapped his campaign by wiretapping Trump Tower in NY. The FISA Court refused permission at first. So, it is likely that Obama henchmen then concocted the "Russian story" to persuade the Court to allow the wiretap. The question is what did Obama knew and when. This was clearly misusing Federal authority to illegally obtain campaign info and covering it up.

2.A second scandal is the shakedown of businesses to finance Leftist activities. Here is how the shakedown worked: Obama's cronies would "find" violations by a business and levy a fine. The business was told that instead of the  fine going directly to Treasury, the fine would be reduced greatly if the business made direct donations to political organizations favored by the Obamas. This practice appears to be illegal in two ways: a) it may be blackmail and b) it is an illegal diversion of funds for political purpose.

3. Obama's presidential eligibility and the story of his birth certificate and Social Security #.

All these scandals need to be investigated by the FBI once it is purged of Obama supporters.

Dem Senators and Obama met Russian Ambassador.

One Dem Senator tried to deny it till she was shown the picture.


http://www.infowars.com/flashback-numerous-dems-obama-also-met-with-russian-ambassador/


In fact, the Ambassador visited the WH 20 times. Trump joked that he wanted Schumer investigated.


The whole thing is a farce, fake news.



Thursday, March 2, 2017

Metal foam destroys armor-piercing bullets

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5334617143001/?#sp=show-clips

The Obama Conspiracy to remove Trump as President.

The Daily Mail has an article on Valerie  Jarred moving in with the Obamas in their Kalorama house in Washington DC: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4271412/Obama-confidante-Valerie-Jarrett-moves-Kaloroma-home.html

The purpose of this is to facilitate Obama's effort to remove Trump as President. See the first paragraph of the article. Obama was confident that Hillary would be elected and she pledged to continue his efforts to convert America into a Socialist "democracy." Obungle did not believe the polls and started an effort to set his conspiracy in place.

The conspiracy claims that Trump got elected by colluding with Russian influence and, therefore, his election is illegitimate. The Deep State (NSA staff and other inbeds of Obama) had wiretapped Russian officials as they sought to make contacts with the incoming Trump team. The wiretaps were then leaked to the New York Times and other Socialists in Europe.

The Democrats want investigations to tie up the Trump Administration and to launch fishing expeditions. The phrase "what did the President know and when" is already flying in Washington. To finance the overthrow, Obama is given a $65M 'book contract' which is just laundering Leftist money. Attacks are already under way at Jeff Sessions to neutralize the Justice Dept while the Conspiracy gets under way.