How to weigh the two "NO"s.

The two NOs in question are Comey's response to two questions:


1. is there any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian agents about the 2016 election and


2. is there any evidence that the Obama regime had Trump under surveillance?


As you know, Comey answered both questions with a "NO." So, how credible are Comey's answers?


Remember that these people are Obama's appointees. If the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians, there would be evidence. Such an evidence can not be faked without detecting that the evidence was faked. That would mean potential jail time for Comey. So, the first "NO" is credible.


How about the second "NO?" There were all sorts of reports in the Press that Trump and his people were under surveillance. Admitting that would put some people in jail. So, the surveillance is denied by Comey. President Trump insists.


The second "NO" is not credible.